Multicriteria based priority mapping: charting agroecological pathways in India

Simple item page
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Instituteen_US
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.contributor.initiativeAgroecologyen_US
cg.coverage.countryIndiaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2INen_US
cg.creator.identifierGopal Kumar: 0000-0003-3036-1619en_US
cg.creator.identifierAlok Sikka: 0000-0001-9843-9617en_US
cg.creator.identifierAbhijit Behera: 0000-0002-0162-8508en_US
cg.identifier.iwmilibraryH053456en_US
cg.identifier.projectIWMI - C-0007en_US
cg.placeColombo, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Gopalen_US
dc.contributor.authorSikka, Aloken_US
dc.contributor.authorBehera, Abhijiten_US
dc.contributor.authorMalaiappan, Sudharsanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-30T08:09:38Zen_US
dc.date.available2025-01-30T08:09:38Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/172484en_US
dc.titleMulticriteria based priority mapping: charting agroecological pathways in Indiaen_US
dcterms.abstractThe report, titled "Multicriteria-Based Priority Mapping: Charting Agroecological Pathways in India," presents a comprehensive analysis aimed at addressing India’s dual challenges of achieving food security and ensuring environmental sustainability. India, with 18% of the global population and access to only 2.4% of the world’s land and 4% of renewable water resources, faces immense pressure to adopt resource-efficient and sustainable agricultural practices. This study employs a robust multi-criteria decision-making framework, integrating diverse datasets and stakeholder inputs, to guide the prioritization of agroecological interventions. Two distinct agroecological priority maps were developed in the study. The first map reflects the priorities of Agricultural System Actors and Stakeholders (ASAS), who focus on rainfed, low-productivity zones to minimize risks to food security. The second map incorporates the perspectives of agroecological advocates, who emphasize the restoration of environmentally degraded, high-input agricultural regions. Both maps integrate critical biophysical, climatic, and agricultural factors, including net primary productivity, fertilizer consumption, rainfall patterns, groundwater levels, and aridity indices, among others. These criteria were weighted using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), ensuring alignment with the specific objectives of each stakeholder group. The study’s findings highlight high-priority zones for agroecological practices that balance yield improvements and environmental restoration. Approximately 1.5% of agricultural land shows overlap in high-priority class between the two stakeholder groups, indicating consensus on some areas. However, the remaining land reveals significant tradeoffs between food security and environmental sustainability objectives, underscoring the complexity of harmonizing these goals. The maps provide insights into spatial prioritization, identifying key zones for targeted interventions, including regions prone to resource degradation and climate vulnerability. This report emphasizes the importance of participatory decision-making, dynamic policy formulation, and periodic updates to the agroecological priority maps. It advocates for enhancing stakeholder engagement through wider consultations and workshops, adopting advanced analytical techniques like Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and integrating new data layers to improve map precision. Furthermore, the study highlights the need for multilocation trials to validate the findings and tailor agroecological practices to diverse agro-climatic conditions. By aligning regional needs with national and global sustainability goals, the proposed methodology offers a pathway to scale agroecological practices effectively. The report concludes with recommendations to refine the priority maps, build capacity and awareness among stakeholders, and integrate findings into national policies and resource allocation strategies. These efforts aim to promote sustainable farming systems, ensuring food security for future generations while mitigating environmental degradation and enhancing resilience to climate variability. This pioneering approach to agroecological prioritization provides a replicable model for addressing similar challenges globally, emphasizing the need for contextual adaptation to local conditions.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKumar, G.; Sikka, A.; Behera, A.; Malaiappan, S. 2024. Multicriteria based priority mapping: charting agroecological pathways in India. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIAR Initiative on Agroecology. 15p.en_US
dcterms.extent15p.en_US
dcterms.issued2024-12-30en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherInternational Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIAR Initiative on Agroecologyen_US
dcterms.subjectagroecologyen_US
dcterms.subjectfood securityen_US
dcterms.subjectstakeholdersen_US
dcterms.subjectdecision makingen_US
dcterms.typeReporten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Multicriteria based priority mapping - Charting agroecological pathways in India.pdf
Size:
3.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download full publication
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

IWMI Reports
CGIAR Initiative on Agroecology
Sustainable Water Infrastructure and Ecosystems (SWIE)