District Director of Agriculture in Ghana Survey

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Markets
cg.contributor.donorUnited States Agency for International Developmenten
cg.coverage.countryGhana
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2GH
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionSub-Saharan Africa
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africa
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/hdvkk4en
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Ghana Strategy Support Program
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Development Strategy and Governance Division
cg.identifier.publicationRankNot ranked
cg.placeWashington, DCen
cg.reviewStatusInternal Reviewen
dc.contributor.authorInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-04T09:44:19Zen
dc.date.available2024-06-04T09:44:19Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/144609
dc.titleDistrict Director of Agriculture in Ghana Surveyen
dcterms.abstractThis data is from a study conducted with 80 directors of agriculture in Ghana’s Metropolitan, Municipal, and District Assemblies (MMDAs). The aim of the survey was to identify how the devolution of agriculture functions to the MMDAs since 2012 has affected their job functions and ability to provide agricultural services to the communities in which they work. The survey is split into 9 modules: 1. Location (LN) – preliminary characteristics of the location where the DDA is employed; the gender of the respondent is also recorded in this module 2. General Information (ID) – basic demographic and educational background, as well as the length of time the director has served in the MMDA 3. Employment History (EH) – details on the current job, number of previous jobs, district location of previous jobs, job experiences, and aspirations within the civil service 4. Agricultural Planning and Implementation (AP) – questions related to the agricultural planning process within the district 5. Agricultural Budgets and Expenditures (AB) – details on the agricultural budgeting and expenditure process 6. Engagement with the District Assembly (DA) – questions related to directors’ relationship with the other sectoral departments of the MMDA 7. Devolution Transition Process (DT) –details about the 2012 devolution transition process and the perceived challenges and opportunities that emerged from that reform 8. Staffing and Resources (SR) – opinions and perspectives of the directors on the staffing and resource availability in their offices 9. Final Section (FI) – enumerator observationsen
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational Food Policy Research Institute. 2020. District Director of Agriculture in Ghana Survey. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HDVKK4. Harvard Dataverse. Version 1.en
dcterms.issued2020
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen
dcterms.relationhttps://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134906en
dcterms.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/145879en
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll3/id/494en
dcterms.subjectlocal governmenten
dcterms.subjectagricultural policiesen
dcterms.subjectagricultural planningen
dcterms.subjectagricultural budgetsen
dcterms.subjectdecentralizationen
dcterms.typeDataset

Files