Dichotomy or continuum? A global review of the interaction between autonomous and planned adaptations
Date Issued
Date Online
Language
Type
Review Status
Access Rights
Metadata
Full item pageCitation
Maskell, G.; Shukla, R.; Jagannathan, K.; Browne, K.; Ulibarri, N.; Campbell, D.; Franz, C.; Grady, C.; Joe, E.T.; Kirchhoff, C.; Madhavan, M.; Michaud, L.; Sharma, S.; Singh, C.; Orlove, B.; Nagle Alverio, G.; Ajibade, I.; Bowen, K.; Chauhan, N.; Galappaththi, E.; Hudson, A.J.; Mach, K.; Musah-Surugu, J.; Petzold, J.; Reckien, D.; Schauberger, B.; Segnon, A.; van Bavel, B.; Gornott, C. (2025) Dichotomy or continuum? A global review of the interaction between autonomous and planned adaptations. Ecology and Society 30(1): 39 p. ISSN: 1708-3087
Permanent link to cite or share this item
External link to download this item
Abstract/Description
Adaptation to climate change is often conceptualized as a dichotomy, with responses being either planned (formal and structured) or autonomous (organic and self-organized, often known as “everyday adaptation”). Recent literature on adaptation responses has highlighted the existence and importance of the interplay between autonomous and planned adaptation, but examination of this interaction has been limited to date. We use a global database of 1682 peer-reviewed articles on adaptation responses to systematically examine autonomous and planned adaptations, with an emphasis on how these types of adaptations interact with one another. We propose a third category, mixed adaptation, which demonstrates characteristics of both autonomous and planned types, and which recognizes nuances in how organization, external support, formality, and autonomy manifest in the fuzzy space between the two. We find that more than one-third of articles reporting on adaptation responses fall into this mixed category, with cases across sectors and world regions. We develop a qualitative typology of mixed adaptation that identifies nine ways that autonomous and planned adaptation interact and influence each other both positively and negatively. Based on these findings, we argue for more nuanced examinations of the interplay between autonomous and planned adaptation and for conceptualizing adaptation planning as a continuum between the two rather than a dichotomy. Exploring the patterns of interplay from a large database of adaptation responses offers new insights on the relative roles of both autonomous and planned adaptation for mobilizing adaptation pathways in locally relevant, scalable, effective, and equitable ways.
Author ORCID identifiers
Shukla, Roopam https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-9383
Kripa Jagannathan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4584-8358
Browne, Katherine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5435-9065
Nicola Ulibarri https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6238-9056
Donovan Campbell https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4511-838X
Grady, Caitlin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9151-6664
Elphin Tom Joe https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1468-6413
Christine Kirchhoff https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-6764
Chandni Singh https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6842-6735
Orlove, Ben https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0489-4219
Gabriela Nagle Alverio https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-3381
Idowu Ajibade https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9767-0435
Kathryn Bowen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-1963
Chauhan, Neha https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-5817
Eranga Galappaththi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3926-2206
Hudson, A J https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6034-3978
Katharine Mach https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5591-8148
Justice Issah Musah-Surugu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3058-169X
Jan Petzold https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0508-3362
Diana Reckien https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1145-9509
Schauberger, Bernhard https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7917-0392
Alcade C. Segnon https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9751-120X
Van Bavel, Bianca https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-4602
Gornott, Christoph https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3933-3358