SIG traditionnels et participatifs

cg.contributor.affiliationCentral Connecticut State Universityen
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden
cg.identifier.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/91603en
cg.journalICT Updateen
cg.placeWageningenen
cg.reviewStatusInternal Reviewen
cg.subject.ctaSIGen
cg.subject.ctaICTen
cg.volume27en
dc.contributor.authorKyem, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T10:14:04Zen
dc.date.available2019-08-14T10:14:04Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/103138
dc.titleSIG traditionnels et participatifsfr
dcterms.abstractPeter Kyem montre que si les SIG traditionnels ou participatifs peuvent jouer un rôle essentiel dans la planification et la gestion des ressources naturelles, les approches participatives offrent d'indéniables avantages.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.audienceDevelopment Practitionersen
dcterms.issued2005
dcterms.languagefr
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserved
dcterms.publisherTechnical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperationen
dcterms.typeMagazine Article

Files

Collections