Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle enclosures in semi-arid sub-Saharan Africa: The case of a rangeland in South-Central Kenya

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen
cg.contributor.affiliationETH Zürichen
cg.contributor.affiliationKarlsruhe Institute of Technologyen
cg.contributor.affiliationMidlands State Universityen
cg.contributor.affiliationAarhus Universityen
cg.contributor.affiliationAgroscopeen
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Funden
cg.contributor.donorEuropean Unionen
cg.contributor.initiativeLivestock and Climateen
cg.contributor.initiativeLow-Emission Food Systemsen
cg.coverage.countryKenyaen
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KEen
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen
cg.coverage.regionSub-Saharan Africaen
cg.creator.identifierSonja Leitner: 0000-0002-1276-8071en
cg.creator.identifierVictoria Carbonell: 0000-0003-3304-8898en
cg.creator.identifierRangarirayi Mhindu: 0000-0001-9729-1817en
cg.creator.identifierYuhao Zhu: 0000-0003-1759-6878en
cg.creator.identifierKlaus Butterbach-Bahl: 0000-0001-9499-6598en
cg.creator.identifierLutz Merbold: 0000-0003-4974-170Xen
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.108980en
cg.isbn0167-8809en
cg.isijournalISI Journalen
cg.issn0167-8809en
cg.journalAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environmenten
cg.placeNairobi, Kenyaen
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.subject.actionAreaResilient Agrifood Systemsen
cg.subject.actionAreaSystems Transformationen
cg.subject.ilriCLIMATE CHANGEen
cg.subject.ilriCATTLEen
cg.subject.ilriRANGELANDSen
cg.subject.ilriGHG EMISSIONSen
cg.subject.impactAreaClimate adaptation and mitigationen
cg.subject.sdgSDG 13 - Climate actionen
cg.volume367en
dc.contributor.authorLeitner, Sonja M.en
dc.contributor.authorCarbonell, Victoriaen
dc.contributor.authorMhindu, Rangarirayi L.en
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Yuhaoen
dc.contributor.authorMutuo, Paulen
dc.contributor.authorButterbach-Bahl, Klausen
dc.contributor.authorMerbold, Lutzen
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-28T15:12:34Zen
dc.date.available2024-03-28T15:12:34Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/140666
dc.titleGreenhouse gas emissions from cattle enclosures in semi-arid sub-Saharan Africa: The case of a rangeland in South-Central Kenyaen
dcterms.abstractExtensive livestock production in pastoral areas supports millions of livestock keepers in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, it is also linked to environmental externalities such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Corralling of livestock overnight in fenced enclosures (“bomas” in Kiswahili) is common to protect animals from theft and predation and is practiced across SSA. Boma manure is usually not removed and accumulates over years, making bomas GHG emission hotspots. The following study presents the first full year of CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions measurements from cattle bomas in a savanna ecosystem in Kenya, comparing active (in use) and inactive (i.e., abandoned) bomas. Active bomas were used for 1–3 months before being abandoned and cattle were moved to a new boma. GHG emissions were measured using static chambers inside three replicate bomas and along three 100 m transects from bomas into undisturbed savanna. Compared to savanna background fluxes, it was found that GHG flux rates from bomas were elevated by several orders of magnitude, with mean fluxes of 487 ± 8 mg CO2-C m−2 h−1, 325 ± 11 µg N2O-N m−2 h−1, and 3245 ± 234 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for active bomas, and 167 ± 52 mg CO2-C m−2 h−1, 610 ± 186 µg N2O-N m−2 h−1, and 3127 ± 1262 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1 for inactive bomas, while surrounding savanna soils only emitted 22.3 ± 18.2 mg CO2-C m−2 h−1, 2.5 ± 2.2 µg N2O-N m−2 h−1, and 0.1 ± 0.7 µg CH4-C m−2 h−1. Assuming that bomas are used for 45 days per year, annual manure emission factors were 2.43 ± 0.42%N for N2O and 0.49 ± 0.07%C for CH4, which corresponds to 2.64 ± 0.37 g CH4 kg−1 volatile solids (VS). These emission factors were similar to IPCC default values for feedlots for low-producing cattle in warm climates; however, the IPCC only considers emissions in year when bomas are in use and does not account for emissions following boma abandonment. At the farm scale, boma manure contributed little (2.2%) to total CH4 emissions, which were dominated by enteric CH4 emissions (97.6%); but bomas were a substantial source for N2O, contributing over 32% to total N2O emissions on the farm. This calls for the inclusion of active and inactive bomas in the activity data collection for national GHG inventories, as bomas are currently overlooked hotspots for GHG emissions that are not represented in the GHG budgets of African nations. To mitigate GHG emissions, manure should be removed regularly and used as fertilizer to return nutrients to the grassland, preventing nutrient mining and ensuring long-term rangeland productivity and resilience, or it might be used to grow crops and livestock feeds.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen
dcterms.audienceAcademicsen
dcterms.available2024-03-15en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLeitner, S., Carbonell, V., Mhindu, R., Zhu, Y., Mutuo, P., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Merbold, L. 2024. Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle enclosures in semi-arid sub-Saharan Africa: The case of a rangeland in South-Central Kenya. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 367: 108980en
dcterms.issued2024-06-15en
dcterms.languageenen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-NC-4.0en
dcterms.publisherElsevieren
dcterms.subjectgreenhouse gas emissionsen
dcterms.subjectcattleen
dcterms.subjectrangelandsen
dcterms.subjectclimate change adaptationen
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0167880924000987-main.pdf
Size:
6.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Journal Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: