Guidance and technology: an assessment of project intervention and promoted technologies

Simple item page
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00099-8en
cg.issn2212-5671en
cg.journalProcedia Economics and Financeen
cg.volume2en
dc.contributor.authorPede, Valerien O.en
dc.contributor.authorMcKinley, Justin D.en
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Ramanen
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Anuragen
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-19T12:55:30Zen
dc.date.available2024-12-19T12:55:30Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/165813
dc.titleGuidance and technology: an assessment of project intervention and promoted technologiesen
dcterms.abstractThis study used primary data, collected as part of the Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) project to compare net returns and cost efficiency between farmers who are beneficiaries of the project to farmers who are not beneficiaries. Additionally, non-beneficiary farmers who use the promoted technologies from the project are compared to other non-beneficiary farmers who do not use the promoted technologies. Propensity score matching is used to account for selection bias when comparing the outcomes of beneficiary and control groups. Results indicate higher return for project recipients as well as farmers who use the CSISA promoted resource-conserving technologies (RCTs).en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPede, Valerien O.; McKinley, Justin D.; Sharma, Raman and Kumar, Anurag. 2012. Guidance and technology: an assessment of project intervention and promoted technologies. Procedia Economics and Finance, Volume 2 p. 373-382en
dcterms.extentpp. 373-382en
dcterms.issued2012
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND-3.0
dcterms.publisherElsevieren
dcterms.subjectcost benefit analysisen
dcterms.subjectfarmersen
dcterms.subjectinnovation adoptionen
dcterms.subjectproductivityen
dcterms.subjecttechnology transferen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files

Collections

IRRI Journal Articles