Evaluation of CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform

cg.contributor.affiliationCGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Serviceen
cg.contributor.crpExcellence in Breeding
cg.subject.systemCRPen
cg.subject.systemEvaluationen
cg.subject.systemResearchen
dc.contributor.authorMcHugh, Karenen
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Vandaen
dc.contributor.authorRagot, Michelen
dc.contributor.authorAcharjee, Sumitaen
dc.contributor.authorNoma, Freddyen
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T12:07:30Zen
dc.date.available2022-08-04T12:07:30Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/120451
dc.titleEvaluation of CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platformen
dcterms.abstractThe Evaluation of CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform (EiB) responds to the request of the System Council (the 2022-24 multi-year evaluation plan) to provide CGIAR with evaluative evidence for accountability and learning. The evaluation and its validation were conducted between August 2021 and April 2022; it is the first evaluation delivered since the approval of the CGIAR Evaluation Framework and Policy (2022). The evaluation assessed the design, implementation, and achievement of the EiB Platform’s objectives based on the evaluation criteria of relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability. An evaluation expert led the team, which included three subject matter experts, and an analyst. The evaluation followed a mixed-method approach including: an online survey (65 respondents); 71 semi-structured key informant interviews, including four in-person interviews in India; document analysis; and deep dives into five EiB Platform modules and three breeding programs. Across the evaluation lifecycle, a multilayered quality assurance (QA) system was followed, as outlined in the terms of reference (TOR), approved by the Strategic Impact Monitoring and Evaluation Committee (SIMEC), and the inception report. The QA process included external peer review at three stages of the evaluation. As part of the expanded QA, a robust validation process (Annex 2) engaged further external subject matter and evaluation expertise. The validation exercise allowed additional data collection, further triangulation toward validated findings and conclusions, and an opportunity to enact the standards from the Evaluation Framework. The evaluation made nine core actionable recommendations targeted to the CGIAR System and the Genetic Innovation Action Area including its Initiatives: 7 were fully accepted and 2 partially accepted. Read the evaluation report and its annexes. Download the Management Response to the Evaluation.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.audienceCGIARen
dcterms.audienceDonorsen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMcHugh, K., Morgan, V., Ragot, M., Acharjee, S. and F. Noma. (2022). Evaluation of CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform. Rome: CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Serviceen
dcterms.issued2022-08en
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherCGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Serviceen
dcterms.subjectresearchen
dcterms.subjectagricultureen
dcterms.subjectevaluationen
dcterms.typeEvaluation Report

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EiB-Eval-Platform-Eval-Validation-Report.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Evaluation Report
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EiB-Platform-Eval-ANNEX-to-Report.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Annexes
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SC16-05a.iii_EIB-Evaluation-Management-Response-1.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Management response
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CGIAR EiB Platform Inception Report 1Oct2021.pdf
Size:
2.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Inception Report

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: