Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date Issued

Date Online

Language

en

Review Status

Peer Review

Access Rights

Open Access Open Access

Share

Citation

Adam, Christopher; Hoddinott, John; and Ligon, Ethan. 2003. Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada. In Household decisions, gender, and development: a synthesis of recent research. Quisumbing, Agnes R., ed. Chapter 5. Pp. 37-40. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157500

Permanent link to cite or share this item

External link to download this item

DOI

Abstract/Description

Economists who analyze household decisionmaking allocation have traditionally assumed that the household acts as a single unit. They assume that there exists one decisionmaker whose preferences form the basis of household welfare and that all household resources are effectively pooled. This approach is known as the “unitary model,” the “common preference model,” or the “joint family utility model,” depending on the study consulted.

Author ORCID identifiers

Countries

Collections