Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada
Date Issued
Date Online
Language
Type
Review Status
Access Rights
Metadata
Full item pageCitation
Adam, Christopher; Hoddinott, John; and Ligon, Ethan. 2003. Dynamic Intrahousehold Bargaining, Matrimonial Property Law, and Suicide in Canada. In Household decisions, gender, and development: a synthesis of recent research. Quisumbing, Agnes R., ed. Chapter 5. Pp. 37-40. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157500
Permanent link to cite or share this item
External link to download this item
DOI
Abstract/Description
Economists who analyze household decisionmaking allocation have traditionally assumed that the household acts as a single unit. They assume that there exists one decisionmaker whose preferences form the basis of household welfare and that all household resources are effectively pooled. This approach is known as the “unitary model,” the “common preference model,” or the “joint family utility model,” depending on the study consulted.