Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry in Africa

cg.contributor.crpClimate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africa
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africa
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Africa
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8en
cg.isbn9789400716292en
cg.isbn9789400716308en
cg.issn1875-1199en
cg.issn1875-1202en
cg.placeCham, Switzerlanden
cg.subject.ccafsLOW EMISSIONS DEVELOPMENTen
dc.contributor.authorLuedeling, Eikeen
dc.contributor.authorSileshi, Gudeta W.en
dc.contributor.authorBeedy, Tracyen
dc.contributor.authorDietz, Johannesen
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-15T12:13:15Zen
dc.date.available2014-08-15T12:13:15Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/41998
dc.titleCarbon sequestration potential of agroforestry in Africaen
dcterms.abstractAgroforestry can raise carbon (C) stocks of agricultural systems, and such increases can potentially be sold as CO2 emission offsets. We assembled information on the biophysical, technical, economic, and practical potential of agroforestry to sequester C for the West African Sahel, East Africa, and Southern Africa. Agroforestry systems (AFS) such as parklands, live fences, and homegardens had substantial C stocks, but only accumulated 0.2 0.8 Mg C ha?1 year?1. Rotational woodlots (2.2 5.8 Mg C ha?1 year?1) and possibly improved fallows in Southern Africa sequestered C relatively faster, but only during the fallow phases. Data on soil C are scarce because most studies only compared soil C under different land uses, which provides limited (and sometimes unreliable) information on sequestration rates. Comparing results from different studies is difficult, because no standard protocols exist. Few studies have evaluated the economic potential of agroforestry to sequester C. However, at prices of $10 per Mg CO2-eq or less, the value of stored C in most systems would be less than $30 ha?1 year?1, which is a small fraction of annual farm revenue and it needs to cover all transaction measurement reporting and verification costs. Practical constraints to C sequestration (CS) such as land tenure, policy issues, and the opportunity costs incurred by possibly foregoing more profitable land management options have not been fully explored for Africa. For evaluating the challenges and opportunities involved in CS by smallholder farmers, comprehensive studies are needed that explore all C and non-C costs and benefits of agroforestry activities.en
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLuedeling E, Sileshi G, Beedy T, Dietz J. 2011. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry in Africa. In: Kumar BM, Nair PK: Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems: Opportunities and Challenges. Dordrecht: Springer. p 61-84.en
dcterms.extentp. 61-84en
dcterms.issued2011
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisherSpringeren
dcterms.subjectagricultureen
dcterms.subjectclimateen
dcterms.subjectcarbon sequestrationen
dcterms.subjectagroforestryen
dcterms.typeBook Chapter

Files