Closing the gaps in experimental and observational crop response estimates: a Bayesian approach

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date Issued

Date Online

2024-07-23

Language

en

Review Status

Peer Review

Access Rights

Open Access Open Access

Usage Rights

CC-BY-4.0

Share

Citation

Mkondiwa, M., Hurley, T.M., & Pardey, P.G. (2024). Closing the gaps in experimental and observational crop response estimates: a Bayesian approach. Q Open, 4(2), qoae017. https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae017

Permanent link to cite or share this item

External link to download this item

Abstract/Description

A stylized fact of African agriculture is that crop responses to inorganic fertilizer application derived from experimental studies are often substantially greater than those from observational studies (e.g., surveys and administrative data). Recent debates on relative costs and benefits of expensive farm input subsidy programs in Africa, have raised the importance of reconciling these estimates. Beyond mean response differences, this paper argues for including parameter uncertainty and heterogeneity arising from variations in soil types, environmental conditions, and management practices. We use a Bayesian approach that combines information from experimental and observational data to model uncertainty and heterogeneity in crop yield responses. Using nationally representative experimental, survey, and administrative datasets from Malawi, we find that: (1) crop responses are low in observational data, (2) there are large spatial heterogeneities, and (3) based on sensitivity analysis, ignoring parameter uncertainty and spatial heterogeneity in crop responses can lead to questionable policy prescriptions.

Author ORCID identifiers

AGROVOC Keywords
Countries
CGIAR Action Areas
CGIAR Initiatives