Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa
| cg.coverage.region | Southern Africa | en_US |
| cg.coverage.region | Sub-Saharan Africa | en_US |
| cg.coverage.region | Africa | en_US |
| cg.creator.identifier | Klaus von Grebmer: 0000-0002-6908-5773 | en_US |
| cg.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.2499/2020isnarbr04 | en_US |
| cg.identifier.project | IFPRI - Agriculture Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI) | en_US |
| cg.number | 4 | en_US |
| cg.place | Washington, DC | en_US |
| cg.reviewStatus | Internal Review | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | von Grebmer, Klaus | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Omamo, Steven Were | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-21T09:50:49Z | en_US |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-21T09:50:49Z | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/160446 | en_US |
| dc.title | Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | In southern Africa, as in other parts of the world, agricultural biotechnology—particularly the production, consumption, trade, and transport of genetically modified (GM) foods—has been steeped in controversy. The divergent and sometimes contradictory positions are grounded in deep-seated beliefs about technology, the environment, the global order, and the meaning of development among the various stakeholders. This paper seeks to explain the arguments that underlie the different positions taken by national and regional stakeholders, including representatives of public bodies, the private sector, and civil society, on the role of biotechnology. It describes efforts to develop a common process for discussion of the issues. The aim of the dialogue is to agree on the process, rather than to develop consensus. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | von Grebmer, Klaus; Omamo, Steven Were. Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa. ISNAR Discussion Paper Brief. 4. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/2020ISNARBR04. | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | ISNAR Discussion Paper Brief | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2006 | en_US |
| dcterms.language | en | en_US |
| dcterms.publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute | en_US |
| dcterms.replaces | https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/125221 | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | conflict management | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | food security | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | genetically modified foods | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | biotechnology | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | capacity building | en_US |
| dcterms.type | Brief | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 125222.pdf
- Size:
- 205.5 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Brief