From no whinge scenarios to viability tree

Simple item page
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Center for Tropical Agricultureen
cg.creator.identifierChristophe Béné: 0000-0002-7078-9241
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.011en
cg.isijournalISI Journalen
cg.issn0921-8009en
cg.journalEcological Economicsen
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.subject.ciatECOSYSTEM SERVICESen
cg.subject.ciatMODELINGen
cg.volume163en
dc.contributor.authorDoyen, Lucen
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, C.en
dc.contributor.authorBaumgaertner, S.en
dc.contributor.authorBéné, Christopheen
dc.contributor.authorBlanchard, Fabianen
dc.contributor.authorCissé, A.A.en
dc.contributor.authorCooper, R.en
dc.contributor.authorDutra, L.X.C.en
dc.contributor.authorEide, A.en
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, D.en
dc.contributor.authorGourguet, S.en
dc.contributor.authorGusmao, F.en
dc.contributor.authorHardy, Pierre-Yvesen
dc.contributor.authorJarre, A.en
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Lorne Richarden
dc.contributor.authorMacher, C.en
dc.contributor.authorQuaas, M.en
dc.contributor.authorRegnier, E.en
dc.contributor.authorSanz, Nicolasen
dc.contributor.authorThébaud, Olivieren
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-21T18:46:53Zen
dc.date.available2019-06-21T18:46:53Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/101652
dc.titleFrom no whinge scenarios to viability treeen
dcterms.abstractAvoiding whinges from various and potentially conflicting stakeholders is a major challenge for sustainable development and for the identification of sustainability scenarios or policies for biodiversity and ecosystem services. It turns out that independently complying with whinge thresholds and constraints of these stakeholders is not sufficient because dynamic ecological-economic interactions and uncertainties occur. Thus more demanding no whinge standards are needed. In this paper, we first argue that these new boundaries can be endogenously exhibited with the mathematical concepts of viability kernel and viable controls. Second, it is shown how these no whinge kernels have components, such as harvesting of resources, that should remain within safe corridor while some other components, in particular biodiversity, have only lower conservation limits. Thus, using radar charts, we show how this no whinge kernels can take the shape of a tree that we name viability tree. These trees of viability capture the idea that the unbounded renewal potential of biodiversity combined with a bounded use of the different ecosystem services are crucial ingredients for the sustainability of socio-ecosystems and the design of no whinge policies reconciling the different stakeholders involved.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDoyen, L. ; Armstrong, C. ; Baumgärtner, S. ; Béné, C. ; Blanchard, F. ; Cissé, A.A. ; Cooper, R. ; Dutra, L.X.C.; Eide, A.; Freitas, D. ; Gourguet, S. ; Gusmao, F. ; Hardy, P.-Y. ; Jarre, A.; Little, L.R. ; Macher, C. ; Quaas, M. ; Regnier, E. ; Sanz, N. & Thébaud, O. (2019). From no whinge scenarios to viability tree. Ecological Economics. 163: 186-188en
dcterms.extentp. 183-188en
dcterms.issued2019-09
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserved
dcterms.publisherElsevieren
dcterms.subjectsustainabilityen
dcterms.subjectcrop modellingen
dcterms.subjectviabilityen
dcterms.subjectviabilidaden
dcterms.subjectecosystem servicesen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
M-From no whinge scenarios to viability tree.pdf
Size:
879.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's version
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

CIAT Articles in Journals
CIAT Decision and Policy Analysis - DAPA