Expert workshop on NAMAs: National mitigation planning and implementation in agriculture

Simple item page
cg.contributor.affiliationCGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Securityen
cg.contributor.crpClimate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
cg.coverage.countryBrazil
cg.coverage.countryCosta Rica
cg.coverage.countryIndonesia
cg.coverage.countryKenya
cg.coverage.countryMalawi
cg.coverage.countryMexico
cg.coverage.countryMongolia
cg.coverage.countryVietnam
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2BR
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2CR
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ID
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KE
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MW
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MX
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MN
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2VN
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionAsia
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africa
cg.coverage.regionLatin America
cg.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asia
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africa
cg.coverage.regionSouth America
cg.coverage.regionCentral America
cg.coverage.regionEastern Asia
cg.subject.ccafsLOW EMISSIONS DEVELOPMENTen
dc.contributor.authorCGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Securityen
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-05T12:51:58Zen
dc.date.available2012-09-05T12:51:58Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/21732
dc.titleExpert workshop on NAMAs: National mitigation planning and implementation in agricultureen
dcterms.abstractThe purpose of the workshop was to support the development of national mitigation planning to advance climate smart agriculture. Key messages resulting from the workshop: 1. Agricultural NAMAs can be a pathway to green growth, food security and sustainable development. 2. Several Non-Annex 1 countries are developing agriculture sector NAMAs, including Brazil, Indonesia, Costa Rica, Mexico, Vietnam, Malawi, Kenya, and Mongolia. 3. There is a need for Annex 1 countries to support NAMA development to enhance Non-Annex 1 countries’ contribution to the reduction of GHG emissions 4. NAMAs can provide additional resources for climate smart agriculture, where multiple benefits, including mitigation benefits, are generated alongside adaptation. 5. Adaptation and mitigation are inseparable and complementary in meeting multiple goals. a. There should be synergies between NAMAs and national adaptation programs of action (NAPAs) at the national level b. Land-based (AFOLU) mitigation and adaptation practices should be integrated for implementation at sub-national levels. 6. A common methodology for developing NAMAs, including legal, institutional, financial, capacity building, and data collection frameworks, would support countries to implement agricultural NAMAs more readily. These should build on existing planning processes, tools, and technologies. 7. NAMAs require a proactive approach by countries. The climate convention should continue to encourage and enable a country‐driven process for mitigation in agriculture for developing countries. 8. Capacity building on adaptation and mitigation in agriculture is needed to support the planning and implementation of national policy.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCCAFS. 2012. Expert workshop on NAMAs: National mitigation planning and implementation in agriculture, 16-17 July 2012. Copenhagen, Denmark: CCAFS.en
dcterms.descriptionFor more information contact Lini Wollenberg <ewollenb@uvm.edu> and Christina Seeberg-­Elverfeldt <Christina.SeebergElverfeldt@fao.org>en
dcterms.issued2012-07-16
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisherCGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Securityen
dcterms.subjectclimateen
dcterms.subjectfood securityen
dcterms.typeReport

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
NAMA workshop report July 2012 FINAL[1].pdf
Size:
242.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Workshop report
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

CCAFS Workshop Reports