Predicting technology adoption to improve research priority-setting

cg.contributor.affiliationDeutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeiten
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Service for National Agricultural Researchen
cg.contributor.affiliationHumboldt Universitat zu Berlinen
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003.tb00248.xen
cg.issn0169-5150en
cg.issn1574-0862en
cg.issue2en
cg.journalAgricultural Economicsen
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.volume28en
dc.contributor.authorBatz, Franz-Jozefen
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Willem G.en
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Kurt J.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T19:24:23Zen
dc.date.available2024-02-09T19:24:23Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/139193
dc.titlePredicting technology adoption to improve research priority-settingen
dcterms.abstractThis paper presents an improved approach for predicting the speed and ceiling of technology adoption, which is a crucial information for research priority setting. In the models it is assumed that both the speed and ceiling of adoption depend on the perceived characteristics of technologies. Knowing the characteristics that have determined adoption in the past provides relevant information about the characteristics which will enable new technologies to be quickly and widely adopted in the future. Using a case study from Meru District in Kenya, it is shown that relative investment, relative risk and relative complexity significantly influenced the speed and ceiling of adoption of dairy technologies in the past. These empirical results are used to predict the speed and ceiling of adoption of potential new dairy technologies to be developed by the Dairy Cattle Research Programme (DCRP) of the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI). The approach is theoretically sound and based on empirical evidence. It clearly distinguishes promising technologies from less promising technologies and is transparent to participants in priority setting exercises. Allowing for the participation of all interest groups within the research system, the approach improves the quality of the assessment and hence the credibility of results.en
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBatz, Franz-Jozef; Janssen, Willem G.; Peters, Kurt J. 2003. Predicting technology adoption to improve research priority-setting. Agricultural Economics 28(2): 151-164en
dcterms.extentp. 151-164en
dcterms.issued2003en
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserved
dcterms.publisherElsevieren
dcterms.subjectprioritizationen
dcterms.subjectagricultural researchen
dcterms.subjectplanningen
dcterms.subjectmanagementen
dcterms.subjectinnovation adoptionen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files