Assessing genetically modified cotton’s economic impact on farmers
cg.authorship.types | CGIAR single centre | en |
cg.coverage.country | Uganda | |
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2 | UG | |
cg.coverage.region | Eastern Africa | |
cg.coverage.region | Sub-Saharan Africa | |
cg.coverage.region | Africa | |
cg.creator.identifier | José B. Falck-Zepeda: 0000-0002-8604-7154 | |
cg.identifier.project | IFPRI - Program for Biosafety Systems | |
cg.identifier.project | IFPRI - Environment and Production Technology Division | |
cg.identifier.publicationRank | A | |
cg.place | Washington, DC | en |
cg.reviewStatus | Peer Review | en |
dc.contributor.author | Horna, Daniela | en |
dc.contributor.author | Falck-Zepeda, José B. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Kyotalimye, Miriam | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-01T13:56:56Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-01T13:56:56Z | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153630 | |
dc.title | Assessing genetically modified cotton’s economic impact on farmers | en |
dcterms.abstract | In Uganda, cotton has been characterized as a crop with relatively low profitability, mostly due to low productivity (Baffes 2009), but also because it is affected by fluctuations in cotton’s world price. Studies done by APSEC (1998, 2001) ranked cotton as the lowest in profitability among the main competing crops on the global market. Despite cotton’s low profitability, farmers continue to plant it. The most-often-cited reason for continued cotton production is a lack of productive alternatives that can generate cash for smallholders and larger farmers during the period cotton is planted. The certainty that cotton producers will have a buyer at the end of the season is probably another strong argument for cotton cultivation: ginneries usually distribute seed and inputs and in turn demand rights over the seed cotton harvest at the end of the cropping season. | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Horna, Daniela; Falck-Zepeda, José Benjamin and Kyotalimye, Miriam. 2013. Assessing genetically modified cotton’s economic impact on farmers. In Socioeconomic considerations in biosafety decisionmaking: Methods and implementation. Eds. Horna, Daniela; Zambrano, Patricia and Falck-Zepeda, José Benjamin. Chapter 5. Pp. 61-93. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153630 | en |
dcterms.extent | 33 p. | en |
dcterms.issued | 2013 | |
dcterms.language | en | |
dcterms.publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute | en |
dcterms.replaces | https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/127852 | en |
dcterms.subject | biotechnology | en |
dcterms.subject | transgenic plants | en |
dcterms.subject | risk assessment | en |
dcterms.subject | economic aspects | en |
dcterms.subject | biosafety regulations | en |
dcterms.subject | biotechnological safety | en |
dcterms.subject | socio-economic development | en |
dcterms.subject | genetically engineered organisms | en |
dcterms.subject | genetically modified foods | en |
dcterms.subject | data collection | en |
dcterms.subject | genetic variation | en |
dcterms.subject | ex ante impact assessment | en |
dcterms.subject | ex-post impact assessment | en |
dcterms.subject | developing countries | en |
dcterms.subject | cotton | en |
dcterms.subject | economic impact | en |
dcterms.type | Book Chapter |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 128063.pdf
- Size:
- 597.69 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Chapter 5