Evaluation of the Impact of Integrated Pest Management Research at the International Agricultural Research Centres

cg.subject.systemCGIAR meeting 1999/10en
cg.subject.systemCGIAR impact assessmentsen
cg.subject.systemIAEGen
cg.subject.systemPest controlen
cg.subject.systemCrop managementen
cg.subject.systemIntegrated pest managementen
cg.subject.systemUniversity of Hannoveren
dc.contributor.authorCGIAR Technical Advisory Committee Standing Panel on Impact Assessmenten
dc.contributor.authorCGIAR Impact Assessment and Evaluation Groupen
dc.contributor.authorWaibel, Hermannen
dc.contributor.authorPemsl, Diemuth E.en
dc.date.accessioned2000-10-01T00:00:01Zen
dc.date.available2000-10-01T00:00:01Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10947/502
dc.titleEvaluation of the Impact of Integrated Pest Management Research at the International Agricultural Research Centresen
dcterms.abstractAn evaluation of the impact of integrated pest management (IPM) research at IARCs commissioned by the Impact Assessment and Evaluation Group (IAEG) and prepared by Hermann Waibel with Diemuth Pemsl of Hannover University. The study was completed in September 1999. The document also includes an excerpt from the summary of proceedings of the CGIAR 1999 Mid Term Meeting where the evaluation results were presented, and a foreword by IAEG Chairman Hans Gregersen.The study was based on analysis of existing documentation and findings. It considered centers' self-assessments of impact, the impressions of their clients and partners, the quantity and types of materials published, and the quality and validity of existing studies of rates of return. Dr. Waibel assessed the efficiency and effectiveness of IPM work at the centers, and linked those results to an overall assessment of impacts associated with IPM activities. He pointed out that the goal of IPM research should not be high returns to that component, but rather to optimize returns to the entire crop-management system.The study finds long term rates of return on investment in IPM to likely reside in the 15-40 percent range. It also notes that while the technological paradigm remains dominant at the centers, emphasis is shifting toward management, thus the social science aspect, and means to reduce the lag between research and adoption. Agenda document, CGIAR International Centers Week 1999.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.issued2000-10-01
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeReport

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
icw9908c.pdf
Size:
8.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: