Conflict-sensitive adaptation governance: Assessing Kenya’s County Climate Change Fund
Date Issued
Date Online
Language
Type
Review Status
Access Rights
Metadata
Full item pageCitation
Medina, L.; Schapendonk, F.; Jaskolski, M.; Osumba, J.; Jebiwott, A.; Singh, R.; Takaindisa, J.; Pacillo, G. (2025) Conflict-sensitive adaptation governance: Assessing Kenya’s County Climate Change Fund. CGIAR FOCUS Climate Security. 60 p.
Permanent link to cite or share this item
External link to download this item
DOI
Abstract/Description
The Conflict Sensitive Adaptation Governance analysis aims to evaluate multi-level climate adaptation policies on whether these instruments are intentionally designed, implemented, and assessed for their ability to prevent new conflicts, create legitimate venues for conflict resolution, and harness their peacebuilding potential. This analysis focuses on Kenya’s County Climate Change Fund (CCCF) mechanism. This adaptation policy instrument operates under the principles of locally-led adaptation. It is intended to assist county governments across Kenya in establishing a dedicated fund that can be readily accessed by community-led adaptation committees to finance locally prioritized and designed adaptation projects. This research developed a practical framework for evaluating climate adaptation policies through a conflict sensitivity lens. The framework includes 22 assessment criteria to guide the analysis across three policy phases. the framework is organized around three key dimensions which can theoretically enable governance conditions for conflict sensitivity to emerge: multilevel governance, adaptive governance, and representative governance. The County Climate Change Fund (CCCF) provides a promising model for conflict-sensitive climate governance by empowering ward-level planning committees and fostering inclusive, community-driven decision-making. Despite its successes, several opportunities for conflict sensitivity and peacebuilding integration remain. This report outlines key findings and recommendations.
Author ORCID identifiers
Frans Schapendonk https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-1786
Martina Jaskolski https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2905-7817
Grazia Pacillo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-3464
Radhika Singh https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-2750