Designing fit-for-context climate change adaptation tracking: Towards a framework for analyzing the institutional structures of knowledge production and use

Simple item page
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationWageningen University & Researchen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
cg.creator.identifierTodd A Crane: 0000-0002-4395-7545en_US
cg.creator.identifierLucy Njuguna: 0000-0002-3564-520Xen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100401en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn2212-0963en_US
cg.journalClimate Risk Managementen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.subject.ilriCLIMATE CHANGEen_US
cg.volume35en_US
dc.contributor.authorNjuguna, Lucyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBiesbroek, Robberten_US
dc.contributor.authorCrane, Todd A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTamás, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorDewulf, Arten_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-08T10:34:52Zen_US
dc.date.available2022-11-08T10:34:52Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/125368en_US
dc.titleDesigning fit-for-context climate change adaptation tracking: Towards a framework for analyzing the institutional structures of knowledge production and useen_US
dcterms.abstractThe Paris Agreement encourages countries to monitor and regularly report on their progress in responding to the impacts of climate change. So far, discussions on adaptation tracking have focused on the technocratic reasons for limited progress on adaptation tracking, for example, financial, methodological, and technical capacity gaps. Substantial variation exists in the institutional context within which adaptation takes place and is being tracked. Yet, recent discussions overlook the importance of the extent to which new systems of adaptation tracking fit within the prevailing rules and practices of knowledge production and use. Although such a fit-for-context approach has been considered important in other fields, no adequate frameworks exist to operationalize it within adaptation tracking. We develop a six-dimensional framework for analyzing institutional structures as the first step towards alignment in the design and use of adaptation tracking: 1) stakeholder participation, 2) transparency, 3) bureaucratic accountability, 4) engagement with experts, 5) politico-administrative relations, and 6) coordination within the administration. For each dimension, we synthesize academic literature, provide variables for operationalization, and provide examples drawn from various regions. The resulting framework allows the description of the institutional structures of knowledge production and use and supports the context-specific design of new programs, tools, and practices for tracking adaptation progress.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNjuguna, L., Biesbroek, R., Crane, T., Tamás, P. and Dewulf, A. 2022. Designing fit-for-context climate change adaptation tracking: Towards a framework for analyzing the institutional structures of knowledge production and use. Climate Risk Management 35:100401.en_US
dcterms.issued2022en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherElsevieren_US
dcterms.subjectclimate changeen_US
dcterms.subjectinstitutional developmenten_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

ILRI articles in journals
ILRI sustainable livestock systems program outputs (2017-2024)
Program for Climate-Smart Livestock