Program evaluation with unobserved heterogeneity and selective implementation: the Mexican Progresa impact on child nutrition

cg.creator.identifierJohn Hoddinott: 0000-0002-0590-3917en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00131.xen_US
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Archiveen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0305-9049en_US
cg.issn1468-0084en_US
cg.issue4en_US
cg.journalOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statisticsen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.volume67en_US
dc.contributor.authorBehrman, Jere R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHoddinott, John F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-29T12:59:57Zen_US
dc.date.available2025-01-29T12:59:57Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/172396en_US
dc.titleProgram evaluation with unobserved heterogeneity and selective implementation: the Mexican Progresa impact on child nutritionen_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper considers the impact of Programa de Educación, Salud y Alimentación (PROGRESA), a large Mexican rural anti‐poverty programme that had an evaluation sample in which overall treatment was randomly assigned to some communities but not others, on child nutrition. When we examine the impact of PROGRESA based on the presumption of randomized allocations, we find that PROGRESA had no or even a negative impact on child nutrition. However, not all children designated to receive nutritional supplements actually did so. Our preferred estimates – child fixed‐effects estimates that control for unobserved heterogeneity that is correlated with access to the supplement – indicate a significantly positive and fairly substantial programme effect of the nutritional supplements on children 12–36 months. They imply an increase of about a sixth in mean growth per year for these children and a lower probability of stunting. Effects are somewhat larger for children from poorer communities but whose mothers are functionally literate. The long‐term consequences of these improvements are non‐trivial; its impact working through adult height alone could result in a 2.9% increase in lifetime earnings.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.available2005-07-22en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBehrman, Jere R.; Hoddinott, John F. 2005. Program evaluation with unobserved heterogeneity and selective implementation: the Mexican Progresa impact on child nutrition. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 67(4): 547-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00131.xen_US
dcterms.extentpp. 547-569en_US
dcterms.issued2005-08en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dcterms.publisherWileyen_US
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/1594en_US
dcterms.subjectnutritionen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files