Assessing the Performance of Agricultural Development Investments A Practical Guide using the SIPmath™ Standard

cg.contributor.affiliationCenter for International Forestry Researchen
cg.contributor.affiliationInnovative Solutions for Decision Agricultureen
cg.contributor.crpClimate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
cg.creator.identifierTodd Rosenstock: 0000-0002-1958-9500en
cg.creator.identifierChristine Lamanna: 0000-0002-6773-7352en
cg.identifier.projectCCAFS: PII-FP2_CSAScalingen
cg.number414en
cg.placeWageningen, The Netherlandsen
cg.subject.ccafsCLIMATE-SMART TECHNOLOGIES AND PRACTICESen
dc.contributor.authorRosenstock, Todd S.en
dc.contributor.authorLamanna, Christineen
dc.contributor.authorSavage, Samen
dc.contributor.authorO'Neil, Dannyen
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Keithen
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T20:50:29Zen
dc.date.available2022-01-24T20:50:29Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/117725
dc.titleAssessing the Performance of Agricultural Development Investments A Practical Guide using the SIPmath™ Standarden
dcterms.abstractThe global community must make significant investments to address climate change and build resilience in agricultural systems. Within climate-smart agriculture investment portfolios, all sizable projects face uncertainty and risk and must be adaptively managed to achieve success.[1]–[4]. This paper presents notes for calibrating a user-friendly tool to screen and compare investment options: The Climate-Smart Agriculture Investment Plan (CSAIP) Cost Benefit-Analysis (CBA) Tool. The CSAIP-CBA models a 20-year period following investment implementation and uses a probabilistic approach to account for uncertainty in project costs and benefits subject to risks and adoption barriers. The model includes measures for number of beneficiaries, adoption rates, estimated impacts, and budget and costs while also considering risks and GHG emissions. Implementation examples of the CSAIP-CBA tool are drawn from investment portfolios prepared for Ghana and Burkina Faso; these suggest that carbon pricing and adoption rate assumptions should be considered when prioritizing investments.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRosenstock T, Lamanna C, Savage S, O’Neil D, Shepherd K. 2021. Assessing the Performance of Agricultural Development Investments A Practical Guide using the SIPmath™ Standard. CCAFS Working paper no.414. Wageningen, the Netherlands: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).en
dcterms.extent31 p.en
dcterms.isPartOfWorking Paperen
dcterms.issued2021-12-22en
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-NC-4.0
dcterms.publisherCGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Securityen
dcterms.subjectclimate changeen
dcterms.subjectagricultureen
dcterms.subjectfood securityen
dcterms.typeWorking Paper

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rosenstock 2021 WP 414 Monte Carlo.pdf
Size:
2.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Working Paper

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: