Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes?

cg.contributor.crpForests, Trees and Agroforestry
cg.coverage.countryPeru
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2PE
cg.coverage.regionSouth America
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892916000229en
cg.issn0376-8929en
cg.issn1469-4387en
cg.issue4en
cg.journalEnvironmental Conservationen
cg.subject.ciforCLIMATE CHANGEen
cg.subject.ciforFOREST POLICYen
cg.subject.ciforREDDen
cg.volume43en
dc.contributor.authorBörner, J.en
dc.contributor.authorWunder, Svenen
dc.contributor.authorGiudice, R.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-03T11:03:07Zen
dc.date.available2018-07-03T11:03:07Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/95513
dc.titleWill up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes?en
dcterms.abstractDeforestation and forest degradation in the Peruvian Amazon represent a major threat to biodiversity-related ecosystem services and the global climate. In 2010, the Peruvian Ministry of Environment launched the National Forest Conservation Program for Climate Change Mitigation, an innovative approach to maintaining forest cover of over 54 million hectares of land in protected areas and indigenous and peasant communities. A key component is a payments for environmental services scheme encouraging investments in sustainable land and forest uses in community-controlled territories. We conducted an ex-ante assessment of how the program would play out in terms of conservation cost–effectiveness, income effects and distributional (equity) outcomes if payments were up-scaled, as intended, to all native communities in the Peruvian Amazon. Our spatially explicit impact assessment relied on remotely sensed deforestation data and field data-supported estimates of conservation opportunity costs. We found that the spatially heterogeneous distribution of forestland and economic returns to multiple land uses across communities results in important tradeoffs between hypothetical cost–effectiveness, poverty alleviation and equity outcomes. Nevertheless, our scenario analyses suggested that alternative design options for payment schemes could improve both cost–effectiveness and equity outcomes simultaneously.en
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Access
dcterms.available2016-07-14
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBörner, J., Wunder, S., Giudice, R.. 2016. Will up-scaled forest conservation incentives in the Peruvian Amazon produce cost-effective and equitable outcomes? Environmental Conservation, 43 (4) : 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892916000229en
dcterms.extentpp. 407-416en
dcterms.issued2016-12
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserved
dcterms.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dcterms.subjectdeforestationen
dcterms.subjectimpactsen
dcterms.subjectassessmenten
dcterms.subjectecosystem servicesen
dcterms.subjectpollutionen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files