Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale

cg.contributor.affiliationBanaras Hindu University, Indiaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sunshine Coasten_US
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.contributor.initiativeNEXUS Gainsen_US
cg.coverage.countryIndiaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2INen_US
cg.coverage.subregionHimalayan Regionen_US
cg.coverage.subregionUttarakhanden_US
cg.coverage.subregionAglar Watersheden_US
cg.creator.identifierD R SENA: 0000-0003-4683-4687en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183409en_US
cg.identifier.iwmilibraryH053185en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn2072-4292en_US
cg.issue18en_US
cg.journalRemote Sensingen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.volume16en_US
dc.contributor.authorGwal, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSena, Dipaka Ranjanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSrivastava, P. K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSrivastava, S. K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T11:26:26Zen_US
dc.date.available2024-10-31T11:26:26Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/158328en_US
dc.titleIdentifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scaleen_US
dcterms.abstractHydrological Ecosystem Services (HES) are crucial components of environmental sustainability and provide indispensable benefits. The present study identifies critical hot and cold spots areas of HES in the Aglar watershed of the Indian Himalayan Region using six HES descriptors, namely water yield (WYLD), crop yield factor (CYF), sediment yield (SYLD), base flow (LATQ), surface runoff (SURFQ), and total water retention (TWR). The analysis was conducted using weightage-based approaches under two methods: (1) evaluating six HES descriptors individually and (2) grouping them into broad ecosystem service categories. Furthermore, the study assessed pixel-level uncertainties that arose because of the distinctive methods used in the identification of hot and cold spots. The associated synergies and trade-offs among HES descriptors were examined too. From method 1, 0.26% area of the watershed was classified as cold spots and 3.18% as hot spots, whereas method 2 classified 2.42% area as cold spots and 2.36% as hot spots. Pixel-level uncertainties showed that 0.57 km2 and 6.86 km2 of the watershed were consistently under cold and hot spots, respectively, using method 1, whereas method 2 identified 2.30 km2 and 6.97 km2 as cold spots and hot spots, respectively. The spatial analysis of hot spots showed consistent patterns in certain parts of the watershed, primarily in the south to southwest region, while cold spots were mainly found on the eastern side. Upon analyzing HES descriptors within broad ecosystem service categories, hot spots were mainly in the southern part, and cold spots were scattered throughout the watershed, especially in agricultural and scrubland areas. The significant synergistic relation between LATQ and WYLD, and sediment retention and WYLD and trade-offs between SURFQ and HES descriptors like WYLD, LATQ, sediment retention, and TWR was attributed to varying factors such as land use and topography impacting the water balance components in the watershed. The findings underscore the critical need for targeted conservation efforts to maintain the ecologically sensitive regions at watershed scale.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.available2024-09-13en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGwal, S.; Sena, Dipaka Ranjan; Srivastava, P. K.; Srivastava, S. K. 2024. Identifying conservation priority areas of hydrological ecosystem service using hot and cold spot analysis at watershed scale. Remote Sensing, 16(18):3409. (Special issue: Application of Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis for Environmental Management in the Global South) [doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183409]en_US
dcterms.extent3409en_US
dcterms.issued2024-09-13en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherMDPIen_US
dcterms.subjectforest ecosystemsen_US
dcterms.subjecthydrological factorsen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dcterms.subjectwatershedsen_US
dcterms.subjectwater yielden_US
dcterms.subjectcrop yielden_US
dcterms.subjectsediment yielden_US
dcterms.subjectrunoffen_US
dcterms.subjectland useen_US
dcterms.subjectindicatorsen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: