Can concessions be justified?: a multidisciplinary perspective from Africa and beyond

Simple item page
cg.coverage.countryBrazil
cg.coverage.countryIndonesia
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2BR
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ID
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionMiddle Africa
cg.coverage.regionSouth America
cg.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asia
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10549810802256205en
cg.issn1054-9811en
cg.issue3en
cg.journalJournal of Sustainable Forestryen
cg.subject.ciforFOREST MANAGEMENTen
cg.volume27en
dc.contributor.authorSinger, B.en
dc.contributor.authorKarsenty, A.en
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-04T09:13:06Zen
dc.date.available2012-06-04T09:13:06Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/20161
dc.titleCan concessions be justified?: a multidisciplinary perspective from Africa and beyonden
dcterms.abstractForest concessions are currently in a state of flux. Despite mitigated results in some regions, they are still hailed as the path to sustainable forest management on other continents. Using geographical, economic, and political viewpoints, this article offers a multidisciplinary perspective to account for this apparent contradiction. The authors conclude that although political actors continue to support or criticize them by using a range of historical, contextual, and ideological associations, large-scale forest concessions can be theoretically justified from an economic and geographical viewpointen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSinger, B., Karsenty, A. 2008. Can concessions be justified?: a multidisciplinary perspective from Africa and beyond . Journal of Sustainable Forestry 3 (27) :224-245 doi: 10.1080/10549810802256205. ISSN: 1054-9811.en
dcterms.extentpp. 224-245en
dcterms.issued2008-11-10
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisherInforma UK Limiteden
dcterms.subjectconcession (land)en
dcterms.subjectforest managementen
dcterms.subjectsustainabilityen
dcterms.subjectfood scienceen
dcterms.subjectforestryen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files

Collections

CIFOR publications