Response to Palmer-Jones comments on Agricultural growth, poverty reduction and agro-ecological zones in India: an ecological fallacy?

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.coverage.countryIndia
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2IN
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asia
cg.coverage.regionOceania
cg.creator.identifierShenggen Fan: 0000-0002-2658-4863
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-9192(03)00048-4en
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Archive
cg.issn0306-9192en
cg.issue5-6en
cg.journalFood Policyen
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.volume28en
dc.contributor.authorHazell, Peter B. R.en
dc.contributor.authorFan, Shenggenen
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T12:52:41Zen
dc.date.available2024-10-24T12:52:41Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/157954
dc.titleResponse to Palmer-Jones comments on Agricultural growth, poverty reduction and agro-ecological zones in India: an ecological fallacy?en
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHazell, P.B.R.; Fan, Shenggen. 2003. Response to Palmer-Jones comments on Agricultural growth, poverty reduction and agro-ecological zones in India: an ecological fallacy? Food Policy 28 (5-6): 433-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(03)00048-4en
dcterms.extentpp. 433-436en
dcterms.issued2003-10
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserved
dcterms.publisherElsevieren
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/2836en
dcterms.subjectagricultural growthen
dcterms.subjectpoverty reductionen
dcterms.subjectindiaen
dcterms.subjectsouth asiaen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files

Collections