Give a man a fishpond: Modeling the impacts of aquaculture in the rural economy

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Markets
cg.contributor.donorUnited States Agency for International Developmenten
cg.contributor.donorLivelihoods and Food Security Trust Funden
cg.coverage.countryMyanmar
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MM
cg.coverage.regionAsia
cg.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asia
cg.creator.identifierMateusz Filipski: 0000-0002-8997-0980
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.023en
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Development Strategy and Governance Division
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Feed the Future
cg.identifier.publicationRankA
cg.isijournalISI Journalen
cg.issn0305-750Xen
cg.issueOctober 2018en
cg.journalWorld Developmenten
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.volume110en
dc.contributor.authorFilipski, Mateusz J.en
dc.contributor.authorBelton, Benen
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T09:11:09Zen
dc.date.available2024-06-21T09:11:09Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/147086
dc.titleGive a man a fishpond: Modeling the impacts of aquaculture in the rural economyen
dcterms.abstractThe rapid growth of fish farming over the past three decades has generated heated debate over the role of aquaculture in rural development and poverty reduction. Central to these debates is the question of whether and how aquaculture impacts local incomes and employment, yet little empirical evidence exists on the issue. To address this question, we propose a Local Economy-wide Impact Evaluation (LEWIE) model which nests fish farm models within a general-equilibrium model of their local economy. The model is calibrated using primary data collected from 1102 households in Myanmar’s main aquaculture zone, representative of 60% of the country’s aquaculture farms. Using this model, we examine the impact of aquaculture on the incomes and labor market outcomes of fish farming households, but also crop farms and non-farm households in the cluster. Simulating one-acre increases in pond/plot surface we find that: (1) aquaculture generates much higher incomes per-acre than agriculture; (2) aquaculture generates larger income spillovers than agriculture for non-farm households by way of retail and labor markets; (3) small commercial fish farms generate greater spillovers than large fish farms. These results bolster the notion that fish-farming, and in particular small-scale commercial aquaculture, may have a significant role to play in rural development and poverty reduction.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFilipski, Mateusz; and Belton, Ben. 2018. Give a man a fishpond: Modeling the impacts of aquaculture in the rural economy. World Development 110(Otober 2018): 205-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.023en
dcterms.extent18 pagesen
dcterms.issued2018-06-27
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherElsevieren
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/6266en
dcterms.subjectfishery productsen
dcterms.subjectfarmersen
dcterms.subjectaquacultureen
dcterms.subjectsmallholdersen
dcterms.subjectlocal communitiesen
dcterms.subjectrural developmenten
dcterms.subjectfishen
dcterms.subjectlanden
dcterms.subjectfish farmsen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files