Meta-analysis of yield-emission trade-off in direct seeded vs. puddled transplanted rice: Towards a cleaner and sustainable production
Date Issued
Date Online
Language
Type
Review Status
Access Rights
Metadata
Full item pageCitation
Reddy, K. Srikanth, C.M. Parihar, P. Panneerselvam, Ayan Sarkar, Kiranmoy Patra, Sneha Bharadwaj, D.R. Sena, G. Sreeja Reddy, Alok Sinha, Rajkumar Dhakar, Virender Kumar, and Hari Sankar Nayak(2025). Meta-analysis of yield-emission trade-off in direct seeded vs. puddled transplanted rice: Towards a cleaner and sustainable production. Cleaner Environmental Systems. 15. p.
Permanent link to cite or share this item
External link to download this item
Abstract/Description
Conventional rice production through puddled transplanted rice-PTR is tillage, water, energy, and capital intensive. Furthermore, it is a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions. In this regard, Direct seeded rice-DSR can be a potential alternative to PTR for reducing GHGs emissions, while sustaining yields. However, depending upon agroclimatic situation, whether the effect of DSR on GHGs emission and yield are consistent or not, as compared to PTR need a comprehensive analysis. To bridge this knowledge gap, we performed a meta-analysis synthesizing 876 paired measurements from 54-peer-reviewed studies to understand how DSR impacts N2O and CH4 emissions, global warming potential-GWP (heat-trapping potential of greenhouse gases compared to CO2), yield and C-footprint-CFP (environmental impact in CO2 eq. due to concerned activity). Compared to PTR, DSR decreased CH4 emissions by 70%, GWP by 37% and CFP by 34%, despite 85% increase in N2O emissions. However, this shift comes with 11% decrease in yield. To decipher the primary factors driving these outcomes, we conducted subgroup analyses by taking environmental conditions and management practices as predictors in a random effect model. Low to medium pH soils, zero tillage, puddled soil (wet DSR), conventional flooding, and high nitrogen rates (>200 kg/ha) are found to be favorable for DSR with comparable yields but posing a discrepancy with environmental sustainability benefits. Therefore, further research to evaluate DSR across agro-ecologies, management practices are needed to optimize yields with lower GWP and CFP.
Author ORCID identifiers
C.M. PARIHAR https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3855-2655
Panneerselvam Peramaiyan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7886-5536
KIRANMOY PATRA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4429-6371
Alok Sinha https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9807-9112
Rajkumar Dhakar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6422-1142
virender kumar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2521-7578
Hari Sankar Nayak https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2585-1576