Supermarket contracts and smallholder farmers: Implications for income and multidimensional poverty

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.contributor.donorDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaften
cg.coverage.countryKenya
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KE
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africa
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionSub-saharan Africa
cg.creator.identifierDennis O. Ochieng: 0000-0002-4769-1713
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101940en
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Development Strategy and Governance Division
cg.identifier.publicationRankA
cg.isijournalISI Journalen
cg.issn0306-9192en
cg.issue20-Augen
cg.journalFood Policyen
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.volume95en
dc.contributor.authorOgutu, Sylvester Ochiengen
dc.contributor.authorOchieng, Dennis O.en
dc.contributor.authorQaim, Matinen
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T12:10:41Zen
dc.date.available2024-05-22T12:10:41Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/142571
dc.titleSupermarket contracts and smallholder farmers: Implications for income and multidimensional povertyen
dcterms.abstractFood systems in developing countries are changing rapidly with a growing role of modern supermarkets. Supermarkets influence supply chains and the way agricultural products are sourced from farmers. Especially for the procurement of fresh fruits and vegetables, supermarkets often contract farmers directly to ensure consistent and high-quality supply. One important question, which is addressed here, is whether smallholder farmers benefit from supermarket contracts. Previous studies address this question, but mostly focus on income effects without exploring implications for other dimensions of household welfare, such as nutrition, health, or housing conditions. Moreover, most existing studies rely on cross-section data. We add to the literature by analyzing effects of supermarket contracts on income and multidimensional poverty using three rounds of panel data collected from smallholder vegetable farmers in Kenya and econometric models with household fixed effects. On average, supermarket contracts increase household income by over 40%. We also find significant reductions in income poverty and multidimensional poverty. Quantile regressions show that farmers in all income groups benefit, but richer households benefit more than poorer ones in absolute terms. However, supermarket contracts cause the strongest reductions in multidimensional deprivations among the poorest households.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOgutu, Sylvester Ochieng; Ochieng, Dennis O.; and Qaim, Matin. 2020. Supermarket contracts and smallholder farmers: Implications for income and multidimensional poverty. Food Policy 95(August 2020): 101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101940en
dcterms.issued2020-10-01
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
dcterms.publisherElsevieren
dcterms.relationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.008en
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/7337en
dcterms.subjectincomeen
dcterms.subjectregression analysisen
dcterms.subjectcontractsen
dcterms.subjectmultidimensional poverty indexen
dcterms.subjectsmallholdersen
dcterms.subjectcontract farmingen
dcterms.subjectpovertyen
dcterms.subjectsupermarketsen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files