Kin transfers as safety nets in response to idiosyncratic and correlated shocks

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Markets
cg.coverage.countryIndonesia
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ID
cg.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asia
cg.coverage.regionAsia
cg.creator.identifierSylvan Herskowitz: 0000-0003-3758-4524
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134964en
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Markets, Trade, and Institutions Division
cg.identifier.publicationRankNot ranked
cg.number2097en
cg.placeWashington, DCen
cg.reviewStatusInternal Reviewen
dc.contributor.authorHerskowitz, Sylvanen
dc.contributor.authorKleemans, Mariekeen
dc.contributor.authorPulido, Cristhianen
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T12:13:43Zen
dc.date.available2024-05-22T12:13:43Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/143379
dc.titleKin transfers as safety nets in response to idiosyncratic and correlated shocksen
dcterms.abstractWhile formal insurance is widespread in much of the developed world, households in lower-income countries continue to rely heavily on informal risk-sharing networks when faced with unexpected shocks. Kin networks of non-coresident family members may play an important role by providing each other with informal social protection, sharing resources in response to correlated production shocks (rainfall) or idiosyncratic household shocks (sickness and death). Using detailed panel data from Indonesia, we examine how inter-household transfers within a household’s kin network respond to different types of shocks and whether they are able to reduce household vulnerability. We find that households are exposed to meaningful risk from variations in local rainfall in the form of both income and household consumption. Rainfall substantially increases both transfers sent and received by households, suggesting that household and local supply effects dominate demand effects resulting from rainfall fluctuation. Finally, we find modest evidence that transfers reduce vulnerability of consumption to rainfall fluctuations by up to 11%, but do not find strong evidence on the efficacy of formal social protection programs.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHerskowitz, Sylvan; Kleemans, Marieke; and Pulido, Cristhian. 2021. Kin transfers as safety nets in response to idiosyncratic and correlated shocks. IFPRI Discussion Paper 2097. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134964.en
dcterms.extent32 p.en
dcterms.isPartOfIFPRI Discussion Paperen
dcterms.issued2021-12-31
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen
dcterms.relationhttps://pim.cgiar.org/2021/11/21/family-transfers-as-informal-insurance-and-liquidity-source/en
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/134964en
dcterms.subjectinsuranceen
dcterms.subjectincomeen
dcterms.subjectrainen
dcterms.subjectsocial networksen
dcterms.subjectshocken
dcterms.subjecthouseholdsen
dcterms.subjectsocial protectionen
dcterms.subjectrisken
dcterms.subjectsocial safety netsen
dcterms.subjecthousehold consumptionen
dcterms.typeWorking Paper

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
135173.pdf
Size:
418.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Discussion Paper