Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire for dietary factors related to colorectal cancer

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.contributor.crpAgriculture for Nutrition and Healthen
cg.contributor.donorFederal Public Service of Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment, Belgiumen
cg.coverage.countryBelgiumen
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2BEen
cg.coverage.regionEuropeen
cg.coverage.regionWestern Europeen
cg.creator.identifierLieven Huybregts: 0000-0002-3068-2853en
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/nu9111257en
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Divisionen
cg.identifier.publicationRankBen
cg.isijournalISI Journalen
cg.issn2072-6643en
cg.issue11en
cg.journalNutrientsen
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.volume9en
dc.contributor.authorTollosa, Daniel Nigusseen
dc.contributor.authorVan Camp, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorHuybrechts, Ingeen
dc.contributor.authorHuybregts, Lievenen
dc.contributor.authorVan Loco, Jorisen
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T09:25:08Zen
dc.date.available2024-06-21T09:25:08Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/148586
dc.titleValidity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire for dietary factors related to colorectal canceren
dcterms.abstractDietary factors play a major role in the development of colorectal cancer. This study evaluated the reproducibility and validity of a 109-food item Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to measure the consumption of foods and nutrients related to the development of colorectal cancer in a population aged ≥50 years in Flanders, Belgium. A semi-quantitative FFQ was administered two times in a period of two weeks to evaluate reproducibility (FFQ1 and FFQ2). The validity of the FFQ was assessed by comparing FFQ1 against the 3-day diary method (3 DD). A total of 162 respondents (mean age 57.5 years) provided data for the FFQ, of whom 156 also participated in the validity assessment. Mean differences in the intake of foods and nutrients between FFQ1 and FFQ2 were, overall, small and statistically insignificant. However, a higher estimation was observed by FFQ1 as compared to the 3-DD method for the majority of food groups and nutrient intake in the validity assessment. A systematic mean difference (g/day) was observed for eight food groups in the Bland–Altman agreement test; the largest was for fruit intake. Regarding the nutrients, a systematic mean difference was observed in calcium, fat, and vitamin D intake. Overall, the reproducibility of the FFQ was good, and its validity could be satisfactory for estimating absolute food and nutrient intakes and ranking individuals according to high and low intake categories.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTollosa, Daniel Nigusse; Van Camp, John; Huybrechts, Inge; Huybregts, Lieven; and Van Loco, Joris; et al. 2017. Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire for dietary factors related to colorectal cancer. Nutrients 9(11): 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9111257en
dcterms.extent17 pagesen
dcterms.issued2017en
dcterms.languageenen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en
dcterms.publisherMDPIen
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/6017en
dcterms.subjectreproducibilityen
dcterms.subjectnutrient intakeen
dcterms.subjectquestionnairesen
dcterms.subjectevaluationen
dcterms.subjectintestinal diseasesen
dcterms.subjectfood intakeen
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen

Files