Measuring distortions to agricultural incentives for value chain analysis: Evidence from Indian value chains

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen_US
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Marketsen_US
cg.coverage.countryIndiaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2INen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.regionAsiaen_US
cg.creator.identifierSimla Tokgoz: 0000-0002-9358-0491en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12305en_US
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Markets, Trade, and Institutions Divisionen_US
cg.identifier.publicationRankBen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0021-857Xen_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.journalJournal of Agricultural Economicsen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.volume70en_US
dc.contributor.authorTokgoz, Simlaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMajeed, Fahden_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T09:04:28Zen_US
dc.date.available2024-06-21T09:04:28Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/145409en_US
dc.titleMeasuring distortions to agricultural incentives for value chain analysis: Evidence from Indian value chainsen_US
dcterms.abstractWe extend the nominal rate of protection (NRP) methodology to a value chain framework. We develop our methodology for three types of value chains: a new value chain created by policy, a value chain in which a by‐product is created in the processing of a commodity, and a value chain in which processing of a commodity generates new product(s). We consider two cases of value chains: when the commodity is tradable and when it is non‐tradable. The proposed indicator, value chain NRP, allows policy‐makers to see an aggregate measure of all policy impacts on all the commodities and products in the value chain, normalised at the farm level. We apply the methodology to selected value chains in India. Our results indicate that farmers are subsidised, but at different rates. Both sugarcane producers and sugar producers are protected, but sugar producers are protected at higher rates. Producers of downstream products such as ethanol and molasses are taxed, whereas the crushing industry is subsidised. We observe that there is increasing protection along the value chain from commodity to product for the oilseeds sector, whereas the picture is less clear for the sugarcane value chain.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTokgoz, Simla; and Majeed, Fahd. 2019. Measuring distortions to agricultural incentives for value chain analysis: Evidence from Indian value chains. Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (2): 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12305en_US
dcterms.extent275-292en_US
dcterms.issued2019-06en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dcterms.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen_US
dcterms.relationhttp://purl.umn.edu/236087en_US
dcterms.relationhttps://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12664en_US
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/6392en_US
dcterms.subjectsupply chainsen_US
dcterms.subjecttaxesen_US
dcterms.subjectagricultural policiesen_US
dcterms.subjectoilseedsen_US
dcterms.subjectincentivesen_US
dcterms.subjectsubsidiesen_US
dcterms.subjectsugaren_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files