Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa

cg.coverage.regionSouthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSub-Saharan Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.creator.identifierKlaus von Grebmer: 0000-0002-6908-5773en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2499/2020isnardp04en_US
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Agriculture Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI)en_US
cg.number4en_US
cg.placeWashington, DCen_US
cg.reviewStatusInternal Reviewen_US
dc.contributor.authorvon Grebmer, Klausen_US
dc.contributor.authorOmamo, Steven Wereen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T09:50:49Zen_US
dc.date.available2024-11-21T09:50:49Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/160448en_US
dc.titleSeeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africaen_US
dcterms.abstractThis paper analyzes an ongoing effort by national, regional, and international partners to raise awareness, promote dialogue, and catalyze consensus-building mechanisms among stakeholder groups on the role of biotechnology in agricultural development and food security in southern Africa. Stakeholders include public bodies, the private sector, and civil society. The paper argues that while responsible adoption of agricultural biotechnology promises significant gains to the countries of southern Africa, governments must clarify its specific role, improve policies for its application, and assess the place of biotechnology in broader development strategies. The issues that surround the introduction, creation, and application of agricultural biotechnology in southern Africa are complex, and the passions behind them are strong. The best chance of building consensus lies in bringing different views to the table for deliberation and information sharing, thus starting a process of collaborative planning, implementation, and evaluation of various activities. Deepening the dialogue and involving more parties has many challenges. Strong conflicts among members are to be expected, and there is a risk of dissolution of the dialogue process as a result of these conflicts and other factors such as lack of interest and shortage of resources. If stakeholders focus on the process, these obstacles can be overcome. Building trust and commitment among the members, maintaining communication, exchanging knowledge, and being open to revision of old views will help the dialogue continue and will ultimately make it more productive.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationvon Grebmer, Klaus; Omamo, Steven Were. Seeking a common path: structuring multistakeholder dialogue on agricultural biotechnology in Africa. ISNAR Discussion Paper. 4. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/2020ISNARDP04.en_US
dcterms.isPartOfISNAR Discussion Paperen_US
dcterms.issued2006en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen_US
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/125223en_US
dcterms.subjectconflict managementen_US
dcterms.subjectfood securityen_US
dcterms.subjectgenetically modified foodsen_US
dcterms.subjectbiotechnologyen_US
dcterms.subjectcapacity buildingen_US
dcterms.typeWorking Paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
125224.pdf
Size:
347.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Working Paper