Conventional and organic farms with more intensive management have lower soil functionality.
Date Issued
Date Online
Language
Type
Review Status
Access Rights
Usage Rights
Metadata
Full item pageCitation
van Rijssel, S.Q.; Koorneef, G.J.; Veen, G.F.(Ciska); Pulleman, M.; de Goede, R.G.M.; Comans, R.N.; van der Putten, W.H.; Mason-Jones, K. (2025) Conventional and organic farms with more intensive management have lower soil functionality.. Science 388(6745): ISSN: 0036-8075
Permanent link to cite or share this item
External link to download this item
Abstract/Description
Organic farming is often considered to be more sustainable than conventional farming. However, both farming systems comprise highly variable management practices. In this study, we show that in organic and conventional arable fields, the multifunctionality of soils decreases with increasing agricultural management intensity. Soil organic carbon content and bacterial biomass, respectively, were the strongest abiotic and biotic predictors of soil multifunctionality. Greater soil multifunctionality was associated with less-frequent inversion tillage and higher frequency of grass-legume cover cropping, and organic farming did not outperform conventional farming. Our results suggest that reducing management intensity will enhance soil multifunctionality in both conventional and organic farming. This implies that, in contexts where high-yielding, high-intensity agriculture prevails, the paradigm of sustainable intensification should be replaced by "productive deintensification."
Author ORCID identifiers
Guusje Koorneef https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-4897
Mirjam Pulleman https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-0176
R.G.M. Goede https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-5187
Rob Comans https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3403-0561