Social protection, food security, and asset formation

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Marketsen
cg.contributor.donorUnited Nationsen
cg.contributor.donorFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nationsen
cg.creator.identifierMelissa Hidrobo: 0000-0003-2121-9522en
cg.creator.identifierJohn Hoddinott: 0000-0002-0590-3917en
cg.creator.identifierNeha Kumar: 0000-0001-7982-3277en
cg.creator.identifierMeghan Olivier: 0000-0002-1589-4225en
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.014en
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Divisionen
cg.identifier.publicationRankAen
cg.isijournalISI Journalen
cg.issn0305-750Xen
cg.issueJanuary 2018en
cg.journalWorld Developmenten
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.volume101en
dc.contributor.authorHidrobo, Melissaen
dc.contributor.authorHoddinott, John F.en
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Nehaen
dc.contributor.authorOlivier, Meghanen
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T09:05:00Zen
dc.date.available2024-06-21T09:05:00Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/145762
dc.titleSocial protection, food security, and asset formationen
dcterms.abstractThe last two decades have seen a rapid rise in social protection programs and studies that assess their impacts on a large number of domains. We construct a new database of studies of these programs that report impacts on food security outcomes and asset formation. Our meta-analysis finds that social protection programs improve both the quantity and quality of food consumed by beneficiaries. The magnitudes of these effect sizes are meaningful. The average social protection program increases the value of food consumed/expenditure by 13% and caloric acquisition by 8%. Food expenditure rises faster than caloric acquisition because households use transfers to improve the quality of their diet, most notably increasing their consumption of calories from animal source foods. Since the consumption of animal source foods in these populations is low, and because there are significant nutritional benefits to increasing the consumption of these, this is a positive outcome. Our meta-analysis also finds that social protection programs lead to increased asset holdings as measured by livestock, non-farm productive assets, farm productive assets, and savings. There is no impact on land holdings though the number of studies that assess these is small.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHidrobo, Melissa; Hoddinott, John F.; Kumar, Neha; and Olivier, Meghan. 2018. Social protection, food security, and asset formation. World Development 101(January 2018): 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.014en
dcterms.extentpp. 88-103en
dcterms.issued2018-01-10en
dcterms.languageenen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0en
dcterms.publisherElsevieren
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/5984en
dcterms.subjectcaloriesen
dcterms.subjectanalysisen
dcterms.subjectsocial protectionen
dcterms.subjectsocial policiesen
dcterms.subjectassetsen
dcterms.subjectdeveloping countriesen
dcterms.subjectfood securityen
dcterms.subjectlivestocken
dcterms.subjectsocial servicesen
dcterms.subjectfood consumptionen
dcterms.subjectpovertyen
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen

Files