Caribbean industry is concerned over uncertainties

cg.contributor.affiliationTechnical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperationen
cg.coverage.regionACP
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionCaribbean
cg.coverage.regionOceania
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden
cg.identifier.urlhttp://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2003/June-2003en
cg.journalAgritradeen
cg.numberJune 2003en
cg.placeWageningen, The Netherlandsen
cg.subject.ctaMARKETINGen
cg.subject.ctaTRADEen
dc.contributor.authorTechnical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperationen
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-09T14:07:46Zen
dc.date.available2015-01-09T14:07:46Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/52556
dc.titleCaribbean industry is concerned over uncertaintiesen
dcterms.abstractThe board of directors of the Sugar Association of the Caribbean meeting on May...en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCTA. 2003. Caribbean industry is concerned over uncertainties. Agritrade, June 2003. CTA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.en
dcterms.descriptionThe board of directors of the Sugar Association of the Caribbean meeting on May 15-16th 2003 noted 'the uncertainties surrounding the future of the European Union's sugar policy after 2006 and that long-term stability in respect of this policy is vital for the implementation of the ACP-EU Sugar Protocol and the SPS Agreement'. Areas of uncertainty include: the outcome of the WTO challenge to the EU 'C' export system; reform of the EU sugar regime; the impact of EU enlargement; the impact of the full implementation of the EBA sugar arrangement; the outcome of the EPA negotiations. These uncertainties are affecting long-term planning and restructuring plans. The directors committed themselves to seeking the 'maintenance of the current level of tariff preferences for African Caribbean and Pacific countries' and a 'fairly managed sugar market in the EU'. Comment: With Commissioner Fischler indicating that, for sectors not yet subject to reform, new proposals would 'follow the general lines of the present proposals', some decline in the EU sugar price appears inevitable. With tariffs being based on the difference between the EU and world market price, this is likely to result in reduced tariffs on sugar imports and hence in erosion of the tariff preferences that ACP exports currently enjoy. For ACP suppliers this issue is more about the value of the preferences per se (how much money you will get per tonne of sugar exported under a reformed sugar regime) rather than the margin of tariff preference. While during the transitional period the EU is likely to opt for a managed sugar regime, Commissioner Fischler has indicated that ultimately the Commission would like to see sugar included in the de-coupled single farm payment system. This implies the ultimate abandonment of a managed sugar regime, possibly as early as 2009.en
dcterms.isPartOfAgritradeen
dcterms.issued2003
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisherTechnical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperationen
dcterms.typeNews Item

Files

Collections