Maneio Animal: Relatório técnico sobre análise do efeito de blocos de ureia-melaço no ganho de peso em bovinos nos distritos de Xai-Xai e Chicualacuala

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date Issued

Date Online

Language

en
Type

Review Status

Access Rights

Open Access Open Access

Share

Citation

Benedito T, Abdul C, Aida C, Olga F. 2014. Maneio Animal: Relatório técnico sobre análise do efeito de blocos de ureia-melaço no ganho de peso em bovinos nos distritos de Xai-Xai e Chicualacuala. CCAFS Project Report. Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).

Permanent link to cite or share this item

External link to download this item

DOI

Abstract/Description

This experiment was conducted to study the effect of supplementary urea-molasses block on the performance of cattle reared by smallholders in Xai-Xai and Chicualacuala districts, Gaza province. Fifty-seven (57) indigenous cattle of between 129-248 kg were selected for this experiment. They were grouped into three treatments by randomization and the experiment was conducted for a period of 60 days. Group 1 was supplemented with locally produced urea-molasses nutritive blocks (BUML), group 2 with urea-molasses nutritive blocks, commercially acquired (BUMC) and group 3 was not supplemented. The study revealed that cattle with access to nutritive blocks, locally manufactured or commercially acquired, had an average daily weight gain of 556.1 or 553 g/day, respectively that was significantly more (P<0.05) than the control that only had an increase in weight of 98.6 g/day in Xai-Xai district. The same tendency was found in Chicualacuala, the live weight gain of cattle with access to locally manufactured or commercially acquired blocks was significantly higher (P<0.05) (337 or 443 g/day), respectively, than those not supplemented with nutritive blocks, that only increased their weight at a rate of 41.7 g/day. Comparing the daily weight gains between the two supplemented treatments, locally manufactured and commercially acquired nutritive blocks, (556.1 vs 553 g/d or 337 vs 443 g/dia), no significant differences were registered (P>0.05). It is concluded that urea-multi nutritive block can be used to improve the performance of cattle.

Countries

Collections