Technical Advisory Committee Fifty-Fourth Meeting, 10-17 March 1991: Report of the Meeting

cg.subject.systemCGIAR meeting 1991/05en
cg.subject.systemCGIAR prioritiesen
cg.subject.systemCGIAR review proceduresen
cg.subject.systemCGIAR strategic planningen
cg.subject.systemCIAT strategic planen
cg.subject.systemEcoregional programsen
cg.subject.systemExternal reviewsen
cg.subject.systemFAO IBPGR relationsen
cg.subject.systemIARC collaboration with NARSen
cg.subject.systemIBPGR external reviewen
cg.subject.systemIBPGR transformationen
cg.subject.systemICRISAT external reviewen
cg.subject.systemICRISAT strategic planen
cg.subject.systemIITA INIBAP relationsen
cg.subject.systemIntellectual property rightsen
cg.subject.systemNARS capacity buildingen
cg.subject.systemTAC priorities recommendationsen
dc.contributor.authorCGIAR Technical Advisory Committeeen
dc.date.accessioned1991-07-01T00:00:01Zen
dc.date.available1991-07-01T00:00:01Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10947/1416
dc.titleTechnical Advisory Committee Fifty-Fourth Meeting, 10-17 March 1991: Report of the Meetingen
dcterms.abstractReport of TAC 54 held in The Hague, March 10-17, 1991, Alex McCalla presiding. TAC reviewed the strategic plan of CIAT, and agreed with its broad directions. TAC looked forward to reviewing the operational implications set forth in the CIAT MTP. The Committee considered the external review of IBPGR, which was in process of becoming an independent center within the CGIAR system. It also discussed the program and management reviews of ICRISAT and its draft strategic plan. TAC prepared commentaries on both centers (included in the report) for consideration of the CGIAR. A progress report on experience gained with the external review process was discussed, and scheduled for CGIAR consideration. A revision of the process was urgently required.TAC agreed on the analytical process to be followed in dealing with CGIAR priorities and strategies. A draft paper on priorities only would be considered at TAC 55. Discussing resource allocation, the Committee endorsed the present rule that centers needed to seek TAC approval for changes exceeding 1% of their budgets.As follow-up to the expansion of the CGIAR, TAC considered IIMI's strategic plan, which would serve as background for the review of the center's 1992 p&b submission. The Committee amended a draft paper on the ecoregional approach to CGIAR research, to be presented to the Group in May 1991. Discussing the response to be made to the CGIAR request for an elaboration of the relationship between IARCs and NARS, TAC members expressed diverse opinions about the role of the CGIAR in strengthening NARS. They decided to prepare an issues and options paper for the CGIAR meeting in May 1991, and develop a policy statement in the light of the discussion.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.issued1991-07-01
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.typeMeeting Report

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cg9110b.pdf
Size:
6.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: