System thinking and citizen participation is still missing in One Health initiatives – Lessons from fifteen evaluations
cg.authorship.types | CGIAR and developing country institute | en_US |
cg.authorship.types | CGIAR and advanced research institute | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | University of Zürich | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | University of Bern | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | University of Liverpool | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | International Livestock Research Institute | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | University of Basel | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | Ifakara Health Institute | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | Scientific Center for Risk Assessment and Analysis in Food Safety Area, Armenia | en_US |
cg.contributor.affiliation | Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University | en_US |
cg.contributor.crp | Agriculture for Nutrition and Health | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Swiss National Science Foundation | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | European Union | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Government of the United Kingdom | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Economic and Social Research Council, United Kingdom | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Medical Research Council, United Kingdom | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, United Kingdom | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Wolfermann-Nägeli Foundation | en_US |
cg.contributor.donor | Swiss Institute for Tropical and Public Health | en_US |
cg.creator.identifier | Laura Cristina Falzon: 0000-0002-4043-1644 | en_US |
cg.creator.identifier | Dr. Kelvin Momanyi: 0000-0002-9357-2686 | en_US |
cg.howPublished | Formally Published | en_US |
cg.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.653398 | en_US |
cg.isijournal | ISI Journal | en_US |
cg.issn | 2296-2565 | en_US |
cg.journal | Frontiers in Public Health | en_US |
cg.reviewStatus | Peer Review | en_US |
cg.subject.ilri | AGRI-HEALTH | en_US |
cg.subject.ilri | ANIMAL HEALTH | en_US |
cg.subject.ilri | HUMAN HEALTH | en_US |
cg.subject.ilri | ONE HEALTH | en_US |
cg.subject.ilri | RESEARCH | en_US |
cg.subject.impactArea | Nutrition, health and food security | en_US |
cg.subject.sdg | SDG 3 - Good health and well-being | en_US |
cg.volume | 9 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hitziger, M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Berezowski, J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dürr, S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Falzon, Laura C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Léchenne, M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lushasi, K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Markosyan, T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mbilo, C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Momanyi, Kelvin N. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Özçelik, R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Prejit, N. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zinsstag, Jakob | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rüegg, S.R. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T15:30:45Z | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-08T15:30:45Z | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113902 | en_US |
dc.title | System thinking and citizen participation is still missing in One Health initiatives – Lessons from fifteen evaluations | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Tackling complex public health challenges requires integrated approaches to health, such as One Health (OH). A key element of these approaches is the integration of knowledge across sectors, disciplines and stakeholders. It is not yet clear which elements of knowledge integration need endorsement to achieve best outcomes. This paper assesses 15 OH initiatives in 16 African, Asian and European countries to identify opportunities to improve knowledge integration and to investigate geographic influences on knowledge integration capacities. Two related evaluation tools, both relying on semi-quantitative questionnaires, were applied to two sets of case studies. In one tool, the questions relate to operations and infrastructure, while the other assigns questions to the three phases of “design,” “implementation,” and “evaluation” of the project life cycle. In both, the question scores are aggregated using medians. For analysis, extreme values were identified to highlight strengths and weaknesses. Seven initiatives were assessed by a single evaluator external to the initiative, and the other eight initiatives were jointly assessed by several internal and external evaluators. The knowledge integration capacity was greatest during the project implementation stage, and lowest during the evaluation stage. The main weaknesses pointing towards concrete potential for improvement were identified to be a lack of consideration of systemic characteristics, missing engagement of external stakeholders and poor bridging of knowledge, amplified by the absence of opportunities to learn and evolve in a collective process. Most users were unfamiliar with the systems approach to evaluation and found the use of the tools challenging, but they appreciated the new perspective and saw benefits in the ensuing reflections. We conclude that systems thinking and associated practices for OH require not only specific education in OH core competencies, but also methodological and institutional measures to endorse broad participation. To facilitate meta-analyses and generic improvement of integrated approaches to health we suggest including knowledge integration processes as elements to report according to the COHERE guidelines. | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | en_US |
dcterms.audience | Scientists | en_US |
dcterms.audience | Academics | en_US |
dcterms.available | 2021-06-04 | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Hitziger, M., Berezowski, J., Dürr, S., Falzon, L.C., Léchenne, M., Lushasi, K., Markosyan, T., Mbilo, C., Momanyi, K.N., Özçelik, R., Prejit, N., Zinsstag, J. and Rüegg, S.R. 2021. System thinking and citizen participation is still missing in One Health initiatives – Lessons from fifteen evaluations. Frontiers in Public Health 9: 653398. | en_US |
dcterms.extent | 653398 | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2021-06-04 | en_US |
dcterms.language | en | en_US |
dcterms.license | CC-BY-4.0 | en_US |
dcterms.publisher | Frontiers Media | en_US |
dcterms.subject | health | en_US |
dcterms.subject | research | en_US |
dcterms.subject | animal health | en_US |
dcterms.type | Journal Article | en_US |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.75 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: