Bias alleviation and value activation in citizens’ juries: Enhancing deliberation and civic engagement in sustainable food systems

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationPhilipps Universityen_US
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Funden_US
cg.contributor.initiativeLow-Emission Food Systemsen_US
cg.coverage.countryColombiaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2COen_US
cg.coverage.regionAmericasen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouth Americaen_US
cg.howPublishedGrey Literatureen_US
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Natural Resources and Resilience Uniten_US
cg.identifier.publicationRankNot rankeden_US
cg.number2320en_US
cg.placeWashington, DCen_US
cg.reviewStatusInternal Reviewen_US
cg.subject.actionAreaSystems Transformationen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaClimate adaptation and mitigationen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaEnvironmental health and biodiversityen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurger, Maximilian Nicolausen_US
dc.contributor.authorNilgen, Marcoen_US
dc.contributor.authorVollan, Björnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-17T20:24:53Zen_US
dc.date.available2025-01-17T20:24:53Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/169372en_US
dc.titleBias alleviation and value activation in citizens’ juries: Enhancing deliberation and civic engagement in sustainable food systemsen_US
dcterms.abstractCitizens’ Juries (CJs) are increasingly implemented as a means to engage citizens in deliberation on complex policy challenges, yet their effectiveness can be undermined by cognitive biases and limited value-driven reasoning. This study evaluates the impact of bias alleviation and value activation exercises on deliberative quality and civic engagement in four CJs conducted in Bogotá, Colombia. Two juries incorporated these exercises as treatment interventions, and two served as controls with extended deliberation time. Results reveal that deliberation itself modestly reduced confirmation bias compared to non-participants, while the structured interventions enhanced participants’ awareness of biases and value-based reasoning. However, the interventions did not significantly reduce the occurrence of biases and led to a perceived trade-off with deliberation time. Participation in CJs also showed improved trust in science and political self-efficacy, demonstrating their potential to foster civic engagement. These findings highlight the nuanced benefits and limitations of integrating debiasing interventions into mini-publics to enhance deliberative quality and equity in policymaking.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBurger, Maximilian Nicolaus; Nilgen, Marco; and Vollan, Björn. 2024. Bias alleviation and value activation in citizens’ juries: Enhancing deliberation and civic engagement in sustainable food systems. IFPRI Discussion Paper 2320. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/169372en_US
dcterms.extent35 p.en_US
dcterms.isPartOfIFPRI Discussion Paperen_US
dcterms.issued2024-12-31en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseOtheren_US
dcterms.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen_US
dcterms.subjectdemocracyen_US
dcterms.subjectenvironmental economicsen_US
dcterms.subjectfood systemsen_US
dcterms.subjectparticipatory researchen_US
dcterms.subjectpublic participationen_US
dcterms.subjectsustainabilityen_US
dcterms.typeWorking Paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ifpridp02320.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Discussion Paper

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: