Migration governance and agrarian and rural development: comparative lessons from China, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Morocco, Nepal and Thailand

Simple item page
cg.contributor.affiliationSOAS University of Londonen
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Birminghamen
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversité Mohammed V de Rabaten
cg.contributor.affiliationSouth China Agricultural Universityen
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Viennaen
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bolognaen
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Instituteen
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Central Asiaen
cg.contributor.affiliationCentre for the Study of Labour and Mobility [CESLAM]en
cg.contributor.affiliationNational Institute for Economic Researchen
cg.contributor.affiliationRaks Thai Foundationen
cg.contributor.donorEuropean Unionen
cg.coverage.countryChina
cg.coverage.countryEthiopia
cg.coverage.countryKyrgyzstan
cg.coverage.countryMoldova
cg.coverage.countryMorocco
cg.coverage.countryNepal
cg.coverage.countryThailand
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2CN
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ET
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KG
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MD
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MA
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2NP
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2TH
cg.coverage.regionEastern Asia
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africa
cg.coverage.regionCentral Asia
cg.coverage.regionEastern Europe
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africa
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asia
cg.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asia
cg.creator.identifierMengistu Dessalegn: 0000-0001-5462-6760en
cg.identifier.iwmilibraryH052005en
cg.identifier.urlhttps://agrumig.iwmi.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2023/07/AGRUMIG-Policy-Brief-Series-No-25.pdfen
cg.number25en
cg.placeLondon, UKen
dc.contributor.authorLamba, A.en
dc.contributor.authorSugden, F.en
dc.contributor.authorAderghal, M.en
dc.contributor.authorFengbo, C.en
dc.contributor.authorPagogna, R.en
dc.contributor.authorMasotti, M.en
dc.contributor.authorDessalegn, Mengistuen
dc.contributor.authorMurzakulova, A.en
dc.contributor.authorKharel, A.en
dc.contributor.authorAmzil, L.en
dc.contributor.authorStirba, V.en
dc.contributor.authorKuznetsova, I.en
dc.contributor.authorVittuari, M.en
dc.contributor.authorJian, C.en
dc.contributor.authorCrivellaro, F.en
dc.contributor.authorNaruchaikusol, S.en
dc.contributor.authorLucasenco, E.en
dc.contributor.authorMogilevskii, R.en
dc.contributor.authorMollinga, P.en
dc.contributor.authorPhalkey, N.en
dc.contributor.authorBhattarai, S.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-19T09:17:22Zen
dc.date.available2023-07-19T09:17:22Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/131214
dc.titleMigration governance and agrarian and rural development: comparative lessons from China, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Morocco, Nepal and Thailanden
dcterms.abstractThe purpose of this policy brief is to draw together key comparative lessons on different types of migration governance interventions in the AGRUMIG project research regions and examine how they support positive feedback loops between migration and agrarian and rural development. This exploration offers stories of success and omission. Moving beyond the elusive triple-win situation on the benefits of migration for destination and origin countries, migrants themselves and the highly politicized domain of the migration-development nexus, our point of departure is that there are vital prospects for augmenting the positive impacts of migration for societies globally. This brief focuses on how migration governance interventions are potentially useful in maximizing the gains between migration and agrarian development in the sending communities in China, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Morocco, Nepal and Thailand.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLamba, A.; Sugden, F.; Aderghal, M.; Fengbo, C.; Pagogna, R.; Masotti, M.; Dessalegn, Mengistu; Murzakulova, A.; Kharel, A.; Amzil, L.; Stirba, V.; Kuznetsova, I.; Vittuari, M.; Jian, C.; Crivellaro, F.; Naruchaikusol, S.; Lucasenco, E.; Mogilevskii, R.; Mollinga, P.; Phalkey, N.; Bhattarai, S. 2023. Migration governance and agrarian and rural development: comparative lessons from China, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Morocco, Nepal and Thailand [Policy Brief of the Migration Governance and Agricultural and Rural Change (AGRUMIG) Project]. London, UK: SOAS University of London. 12p. (AGRUMIG Policy Brief Series 25)en
dcterms.extent12p.en
dcterms.isPartOfAGRUMIG Policy Brief Seriesen
dcterms.issued2023-07-19en
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherUniversity of Londonen
dcterms.subjectmigrationen
dcterms.subjectgovernanceen
dcterms.subjectmigrant labouren
dcterms.subjectagrarian structureen
dcterms.subjectrural developmenten
dcterms.subjectpoliciesen
dcterms.subjectemploymenten
dcterms.subjecttrainingen
dcterms.subjectimpact assessmenten
dcterms.subjectmonitoring and evaluationen
dcterms.subjectfinancingen
dcterms.subjectpolitical aspectsen
dcterms.subjectcommunitiesen
dcterms.typeBrief

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

IWMI Briefs
Governance and Inclusion (Govl)