Carbon farming in India: are the existing projects inclusive, additional, and permanent?

cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Centeren
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Funden
cg.contributor.donorIndian Council of Agricultural Researchen
cg.contributor.donorUnited States Agency for International Developmenten
cg.contributor.initiativeTransforming Agrifood Systems in South Asia
cg.coverage.countryIndia
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2IN
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asia
cg.creator.identifierADEETH AG CARIAPPA: 0000-0001-8920-1586
cg.creator.identifierVijesh Krishna: 0000-0003-2191-4736
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2416497en
cg.isijournalISI Journalen
cg.issn1469-3062en
cg.issn1752-7457en
cg.journalClimate Policyen
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.subject.actionAreaSystems Transformation
cg.subject.actionAreaResilient Agrifood Systems
cg.subject.impactAreaClimate adaptation and mitigation
cg.subject.impactAreaPoverty reduction, livelihoods and jobs
dc.contributor.authorAdeeth AG Cariappaen
dc.contributor.authorKrishna, Vijesh V.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-31T15:51:16Zen
dc.date.available2024-10-31T15:51:16Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/158344
dc.titleCarbon farming in India: are the existing projects inclusive, additional, and permanent?en
dcterms.abstractAs voluntary carbon markets gain popularity, carbon farming emerges as a win-win strategy to mitigate climate change and improve farmers’ income in developing countries. India, with over 50 active carbon farming projects and an impending domestic carbon market, forms an ideal case to explore the early-stage challenges of these initiatives. Using survey data from 841 farmers from seven carbon farming project villages in Haryana and Madhya Pradesh, this study focused on socio-economic inclusion and adherence to additionality and permanence principles, which are underexplored in the existing literature. We found that carbon farmers were predominantly large-holders and from non-marginalized castes, showing patterns of systematic exclusion. Only 4% of participants were women. Around 99% of farmers had not received any monetary benefit. While certain agricultural practices predated carbon projects, raising concerns about additionality, practices like no-tillage, alternate wetting and drying, intercropping, reduced chemical fertilizers, micro-irrigation, and tree planting aligned with additionality principles. Nonetheless, a high disadoption rate (28%) raises concerns about the permanence of emissions reduction. Our findings also indicated that companies that exclusively focus on carbon credits, termed ‘Carbon Core’ companies in this study, were more efficient in spreading regenerative agricultural practices than subsidiaries or offshoots of larger corporations whose primary businesses are unrelated to carbon credits.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.available2024-10-20
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCariappa, A. A. G., & Krishna, V. V. (2024). Carbon farming in India: Are the existing projects inclusive, additional, and permanent? Climate Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2416497en
dcterms.extentpp. 1-16en
dcterms.hasVersionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10883/34991en
dcterms.issued2024-10
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherTaylor and Francisen
dcterms.subjectcarbonen
dcterms.subjectsocial inclusionen
dcterms.subjectclimate changeen
dcterms.subjectfarm surveysen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
68028.pdf
Size:
1.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
https://hdl.handle.net/10883/34991

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: