Misreporting month of birth: Implications for nutrition research

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.contributor.crpAgriculture for Nutrition and Health
cg.contributor.donorBill & Melinda Gates Foundationen
cg.creator.identifierDEREK HEADEY: 0000-0003-2476-5131
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Advancing Research on Nutrition and Agriculture (ARENA)
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division
cg.identifier.publicationRankNot ranked
cg.number1617en
cg.placeWashington, DCen
cg.reviewStatusInternal Reviewen
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Anna Folkeen
dc.contributor.authorHeadey, Derek D.en
dc.contributor.authorMasters, William A.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T09:23:41Zen
dc.date.available2024-06-21T09:23:41Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/148025
dc.titleMisreporting month of birth: Implications for nutrition researchen
dcterms.abstractHeight-for-age z-scores (HAZs) and stunting status (HAZ<−2) are widely used to measure child nutrition and population health. However, accurate measurement of age is nontrivial in populations with low levels of literacy and numeracy, limited use of formal birth records, and weak cultural norms surrounding birthdays and calendar use. In this paper we use Demographic and Health Surveys data from 62 countries over the period 1990–2014 to describe two statistical artifacts indicative of misreporting of age. The first artifact consists of lower HAZs for children reported to be born earlier in each calendar year (resulting in implausibly large HAZ gaps between January- and December-born children), which is consistent with some degree of randomness in month of birth reporting. The second artifact consists of lower HAZs for children with a reported age just below a round age (and hence implausibly large HAZ gaps between children with reported ages just below and just above round ages), which is consistent with survey respondents rounding ages down more than they round ages up. Using simulations, we show how these forms of misreporting child age can replicate observed patterns in the data, and that they have small impacts on estimated rates of stunting but important implications for research that relies on birth timing to identify exposure to various risks, particularly seasonal shocks. Moreover, the misreporting we identify differs from conventional age-heaping concerns, implying that the metrics described above could constitute useful markers of measurement error in nutrition surveys. Future research should also investigate ways to reduce these errors.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLarsen, Anna Folke; Headey, Derek D.; and Masters, William A. 2017. Misreporting month of birth: Implications for nutrition research. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1617. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148025en
dcterms.extent52 pagesen
dcterms.isPartOfIFPRI Discussion Paperen
dcterms.issued2017
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen
dcterms.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/150998en
dcterms.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/150408en
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/131098en
dcterms.subjectchild developmenten
dcterms.subjectstuntingen
dcterms.subjectmeasurementen
dcterms.subjectnutritionen
dcterms.subjectchildrenen
dcterms.typeWorking Paper

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
131309.pdf
Size:
9.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Discussion Paper