Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions

Simple item page
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen
cg.contributor.affiliationBrookings Institutionen
cg.contributor.donorUnited States Agency for International Developmenten
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Funden
cg.contributor.initiativeFragility, Conflict, and Migration
cg.coverage.countryNepal
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2NP
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asia
cg.coverage.regionAsia
cg.creator.identifierJordan Kyle: 0000-0003-0551-8047
cg.creator.identifierDanielle Resnick: 0000-0001-6285-3461
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Development Strategies and Governance Unit
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Systems Transformation - Transformation Strategies
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Poverty, Gender, and Inclusion Unit
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Systems Transformation - Food and Nutrition Policy
cg.identifier.publicationRankNot ranked
cg.identifier.urlhttps://www.brookings.edu/articles/sure-bets-or-risky-gambles-understanding-popular-support-for-post-conflict-constitutions/en
cg.number16-Jun-23en
cg.reviewStatusInternal Reviewen
cg.subject.actionAreaSystems Transformation
dc.contributor.authorKyle, Jordanen
dc.contributor.authorResnick, Danielleen
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T09:33:07Zen
dc.date.available2023-08-08T09:33:07Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/131468
dc.titleSure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutionsen
dcterms.abstractWhat shapes mass attitudes towards constitutional reforms in post-conflict contexts? Constitutional reform has long been a priority for states emerging from conflict, where there is a need to rectify the marginalization of certain groups, define the scopes of authority of different institutions, and delineate power-sharing arrangements. Yet, because constitutional reforms are often led by political elites, we typically lack insights into the views of the broader populace.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKyle, Jordan; and Resnick, Danielle. 2023. Sure bets or risky gambles? Understanding popular support for post-conflict constitutions. Brookings Institute Working Paper June 2023. Washington, DC: Brookings Insitution. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/sure-bets-or-risky-gambles-understanding-popular-support-for-post-conflict-constitutions/en
dcterms.isPartOfBrookings Institute Working Paperen
dcterms.issued2023-06-16
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.relationhttps://www.brookings.edu/articles/building-popular-support-for-post-conflict-constitutions-lessons-from-nepal/en
dcterms.replaceshttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/130961en
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/8749en
dcterms.subjectconstitutionen
dcterms.subjectconflicten
dcterms.subjectethnic groupsen
dcterms.subjectauthoritiesen
dcterms.subjectreformsen
dcterms.subjectclass conflicten
dcterms.subjectbehaviouren
dcterms.subjectrisken
dcterms.typeWorking Paper

Files

Collections

CGIAR Initiative on Fragility, Conflict, and Migration
IFPRI Working Papers