Cash transfers, migration, and gender norms

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Markets
cg.coverage.countryMali
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ML
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africa
cg.coverage.regionSub-Saharan Africa
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.creator.identifierMelissa Hidrobo: 0000-0003-2121-9522
cg.creator.identifierValerie Mueller: 0000-0003-1246-2141
cg.creator.identifierShalini Roy: 0000-0001-8053-1650
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12261en
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division
cg.identifier.publicationRankA
cg.isijournalISI Journalen
cg.issn0002-9092en
cg.issue2en
cg.journalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economicsen
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.volume104en
dc.contributor.authorHidrobo, Melissaen
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Valerieen
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Shalinien
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T13:37:46Zen
dc.date.available2024-04-12T13:37:46Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/141364
dc.titleCash transfers, migration, and gender normsen
dcterms.abstractAlthough migration remains crucial for economic development, financial constraints may limit individual ability to migrate. A recent literature demonstrates that social protection programs encourage migration; however, how norms shape the migration decision of women and men are rarely considered. Analysis of 2209 panel households (2014–2016) in Mali suggests that men predominantly move for employment, whereas women move to rural areas for marriage and urban areas for employment. We then test, in the context of a large-scale randomized controlled trial, how a cash transfer (CT) program in Mali affects the migration patterns of men and women. We find the probability of rural–rural migration among men in beneficiary households increases by 0.9 percentage points (an effect size of 100%), whereas the probability of rural–urban migration among women decreases by 0.2 percentage points (an effect size of 50%). We find no impacts on average women's rural–rural migration or men's rural–urban migration. However, women in less poor beneficiary households are more likely to engage in rural–rural migration as a result of the CT, whereas women in poorer beneficiary households realize no immediate impact. Our findings indicate that the provision of cash potentially fosters investment in profitable endeavors outside of subsistence agriculture for men but may also affect the marital migration of women.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHidrobo, Melissa; Mueller, Valerie; and Roy, Shalini. 2022. Cash transfers, migration, and gender norms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 104(2): 550-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12261en
dcterms.extentpp. 550-568en
dcterms.issued2022-03-01
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherAgricultural and Applied Economics Associationen
dcterms.relationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102410en
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/7912en
dcterms.subjectgenderen
dcterms.subjecturban areasen
dcterms.subjecthouseholdsen
dcterms.subjectsocial protectionen
dcterms.subjectcash transfersen
dcterms.subjectmigrationen
dcterms.subjectrural areasen
dcterms.subjectwomenen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files