Detection and quantification of pesticide residues in tomatoes sold in urban markets of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationNational Institute of Statistics and Demography, Burkina Fasoen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Greenwichen_US
cg.contributor.donorBill & Melinda Gates Foundationen_US
cg.contributor.donorForeign, Commonwealth and Development Office, United Kingdomen_US
cg.contributor.donorFederal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germanyen_US
cg.coverage.countryBurkina Fasoen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2BFen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.creator.identifierMichel Dione: 0000-0001-7812-5776en_US
cg.creator.identifierGetachew Dinede: 0000-0001-9224-9716en_US
cg.creator.identifierKristina Roesel: 0000-0002-2553-1129en_US
cg.creator.identifierDelia Grace: 0000-0002-0195-9489en_US
cg.creator.identifierTheo Knight-Jones: 0000-0003-4342-6055en_US
cg.creator.identifierSidwatta Guy Ilboudo: 0000-0001-6061-7035en_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1213085en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn2571-581Xen_US
cg.journalFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systemsen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.subject.ilriFOOD SAFETYen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food securityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 2 - Zero hungeren_US
cg.volume7en_US
dc.contributor.authorDione, Michel M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDjouaka, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMbokou, S.F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIlboudo, Guy S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOuedraogo, A.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDinede, Getachewen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoesel, Kristinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Deliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKnight-Jones, Theodore J.D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-19T13:57:26Zen_US
dc.date.available2023-07-19T13:57:26Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/131220en_US
dc.titleDetection and quantification of pesticide residues in tomatoes sold in urban markets of Ouagadougou, Burkina Fasoen_US
dcterms.abstractIntroduction: “What people worry about, and what makes them sick and kills them, are not the same” is maxim for risk communication experts. In Burkina Faso, pesticides are used by vegetable producers to improve productivity. However, consumer concern over pesticide use is high. Of course, if over-used pesticides could have serious health consequences for producers and consumers and also cause ecological damage. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to detect and quantify the levels of residues of pesticides in tomatoes sold in urban markets of Ouagadougou. Two samples were collected from each vendor (n = 328 vendors) making a total of 656 tomato samples from 26 markets. Samples were subjected to High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for detection and quantification of six pesticide residues commonly used in West Africa including acetamiprid, chlorpyrifos, lambda-cyhalothrin, deltamethrin, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and permethrin. Results: Overall, 62.2% of tomato samples contained at least one pesticide residue including acetamiprid, chlorpyrifos, lambda-cyhalothrin and DDT. Deltamethrin and permethrin were however not detected in any samples. The highest proportions of samples were contaminated with DDT (32.9, 95%CI: 27.9–38.3%), followed by acetamiprid (31.1, 95%CI: 26.2–36.5%), lambda-cyhalothrin (28.4, 95%CI: 23.6–33.6%) and chlorpyrifos (10.7, 95%CI, 7.6–14.6%). 21.3% of samples exceeded Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) including Acetamiprid (13.1%), DDT (7.3%), lambda-cyhalothrin (2.1%) and chlorpyrifos (0.3%); while 61.3% of sample exceeded European Union (EU) MRLs. Multiple pesticide residues (up to 4) were detected simultaneously in 27.7% of the total samples. Conclusion: The study suggests that producers and consumers may be exposed to pesticides that can be highly toxic to them and to the environment. We recommend further quantitative risk assessment for consumer exposure and identification of best procedures to reduce residues in vegetables. Meanwhile, monitoring and regulating pesticide use, with the promotion of good agricultural practices, are warranted to prevent consumers, producers and environmental exposure. However, given this may not be effective, promotion of consumer washing and peeling of vegetables may be warranted to at least empower consumers to protect themselves. Moreover, where resources are scarce they should be directed to the highest burden hazards and in Burkina Faso, these are not likely to be pesticides.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceAcademicsen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.available2023-07-11en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDione, M.M., Djouaka, R., Mbokou, S.F., Ilboudo, G.S., Ouedraogo, A.A., Dinede, G., Roesel, K., Grace, D. and Knight-Jones, T.J.D. 2023. Detection and quantification of pesticide residues in tomatoes sold in urban markets of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7: 1213085.en_US
dcterms.extent1213085en_US
dcterms.issued2023-07-11en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dcterms.subjectfood safetyen_US
dcterms.subjectpesticide residuesen_US
dcterms.subjectvegetablesen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: