Welfare and vulnerability: Findings from the first round of the Myanmar Household Welfare Survey

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Markets
cg.contributor.donorUnited States Agency for International Developmenten
cg.contributor.donorLivelihoods and Food Security Trust Funden
cg.coverage.countryMyanmar
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MM
cg.coverage.regionSouth-eastern Asia
cg.coverage.regionAsia
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.135931en
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Myanmar Strategy Support Program
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Myanmar Agriculture Policy Support Activity
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Feed the Future
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Developing Local Extension Capacity (DLEC)
cg.identifier.publicationRankNot ranked
cg.number18en
cg.placeWashington, DCen
cg.reviewStatusInternal Reviewen
dc.contributor.authorMyanmar Agriculture Policy Support Activityen
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T13:37:00Zen
dc.date.available2024-04-12T13:37:00Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/140981
dc.titleWelfare and vulnerability: Findings from the first round of the Myanmar Household Welfare Surveyen
dcterms.abstractThe first round of the Myanmar Household Welfare Survey (MHWS), a nationally and regionally representative phone survey, was implemented between December 2021 and February 2022 with 12,100 households. This report discusses its findings related to shocks, livelihoods, coping strategies and food security. We find that almost 1 in 5 households experience physical insecurity, more than 1 in 10 were negatively affected by climatic shocks, and 3 in 5 experienced sickness or death of household members in the past three months. Two thirds of households reported a lower income in the beginning of 2022 compared to 12 months earlier, indicating widespread impacts of the pandemic, the political crisis, and the ensuing economic crisis. Ninety percent of households applied at least one coping strategy to deal with lack of food or money during the past month. More than half of all households lowered food and non-food expenditures. A large number of households also used more dramatic coping strategies, including high-risk income generating activities (4 percent), children working (3 percent of households), migration (1 percent), or selling of the dwelling or land (1 percent). Even though data were collected in the beginning of 2022 after the monsoon harvest and thus a relatively favorable time of the year for food security, still 9 percent of the households did not have an adequate food consumption pattern and 4 percent suffered from moderate or severe hunger. Violent events in the township, self-reported physical insecurity, climatic and health shocks all are strongly associated with negative outcomes for income, coping and food security. Chin and Kayah state experienced high levels of violence and consistently perform worse across the range of welfare indicators considered.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMyanmar Agriculture Policy Support Activity (MAPSA). 2022. Welfare and vulnerability: Findings from the first round of the Myanmar Household Welfare Survey. Myanmar SSP Working Paper 18. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.135931.en
dcterms.extent28 p.en
dcterms.isPartOfIFPRI Myanmar SSP Working Paperen
dcterms.issued2022-06-02
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Instituteen
dcterms.replaceshttps://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/135931en
dcterms.subjecteconomic situationen
dcterms.subjectshocken
dcterms.subjectsurveysen
dcterms.subjectvulnerabilityen
dcterms.subjecthouseholdsen
dcterms.subjectwelfareen
dcterms.subjecthungeren
dcterms.subjectlivelihoodsen
dcterms.subjectfood consumptionen
dcterms.typeWorking Paper

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
136143.pdf
Size:
3.91 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Working Paper