Politics and power in territorial planning: insights from two 'Ecological-Economic Zoning' multi-stakeholder processes in the Brazilian Amazon
| cg.authorship.types | CGIAR and advanced research institute | en |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | Center for International Forestry Research | en |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | Oregon State University | en |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | University of Florida | en |
| cg.contributor.crp | Forests, Trees and Agroforestry | en |
| cg.contributor.crp | Policies, Institutions, and Markets | en |
| cg.contributor.donor | Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation | en |
| cg.contributor.donor | European Union | en |
| cg.contributor.donor | Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection, Germany | en |
| cg.coverage.country | Brazil | en |
| cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2 | BR | en |
| cg.coverage.region | South America | en |
| cg.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1505/146554821833466077 | en |
| cg.isijournal | ISI Journal | en |
| cg.issn | 1465-5489 | en |
| cg.issue | S1 | en |
| cg.journal | International Forestry Review | en |
| cg.reviewStatus | Peer Review | en |
| cg.subject.cifor | FOREST GOVERNANCE | en |
| cg.volume | 23 | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Gonzales Tovar, J. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Larson, A.M. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Sarmiento Barletti, J.P. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Barnes, G. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-24T06:25:48Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-24T06:25:48Z | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115137 | |
| dc.title | Politics and power in territorial planning: insights from two 'Ecological-Economic Zoning' multi-stakeholder processes in the Brazilian Amazon | en |
| dcterms.abstract | The use of multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) in territorial planning has gained global popularity. These MSFs aim to bring diverse actors together to collaboratively and equitably develop a plan that assigns optimal land uses to a territory. However, as promoting particular land uses and benefits for some actors often comes at a cost to others, territorial planning MSFs may reproduce or even exacerbate, rather than mitigate, conflicts and asymmetries. We comparatively analyze collaboration, power relations and sustainability goals in the Ecological-Economic Zoning commissions of Acre and Mato Grosso, Brazil, which fall under the same federal mandate but operate in contrasting contexts. We show how territorial planning MSFs have better chances of meeting their goals when they are understood as political processes: in this case, when they emerge from and are nourished by powerful local social-environmental movements and alliances, rather than being technocratic initiatives opposed by powerful local production-business alliances. | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | en |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Tovar, J.G., Larson, A.M., Barletti, J.P. and Barnes, G., 2021. Politics and power in territorial planning: insights from two'Ecological-Economic Zoning'multi-stakeholder processes in the Brazilian Amazon. International Forestry Review, 23(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554821833466077 | en |
| dcterms.extent | 59-75 | en |
| dcterms.issued | 2021-07-26 | en |
| dcterms.language | en | en |
| dcterms.license | CC-BY-4.0 | en |
| dcterms.publisher | Commonwealth Forestry Association | en |
| dcterms.subject | sustainable development | en |
| dcterms.subject | governance | en |
| dcterms.subject | stakeholders | en |
| dcterms.subject | collaboration | en |
| dcterms.subject | land use planning | en |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | en |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.75 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: