Multiple pathogens co-exposure and associated risk factors among cattle reared in a wildlife-livestock interface area in Kenya

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Embuen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationKenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organizationen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationZoonotic Disease Unit, Kenyaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationMinistry of Health, Kenyaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationMinistry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Fisheries, Kenyaen_US
cg.contributor.donorEuropean Unionen_US
cg.contributor.donorGerman Academic Exchange Serviceen_US
cg.contributor.donorUnited States Defense Threat Reduction Agencyen_US
cg.coverage.countryKenyaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KEen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.creator.identifierDaniel Nthiwa: 0000-0002-3993-4164en_US
cg.creator.identifierRichard Nyamota: 0000-0002-9569-1953en_US
cg.creator.identifierJames Akoko: 0000-0001-5730-4505en_US
cg.creator.identifierBernard Bett: 0000-0001-9376-2941en_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1415423en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn2297-1769en_US
cg.journalFrontiers in Veterinary Scienceen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.subject.actionAreaResilient Agrifood Systemsen_US
cg.subject.ilriANIMAL DISEASESen_US
cg.subject.ilriBRUCELLOSISen_US
cg.subject.ilriCATTLEen_US
cg.subject.ilriLIVESTOCKen_US
cg.subject.ilriWILDLIFEen_US
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food securityen_US
cg.subject.impactPlatformNutrition, Health and Food Securityen_US
cg.subject.sdgSDG 2 - Zero hungeren_US
cg.volume11en_US
dc.contributor.authorManyenya, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNthiwa, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorLutta, H.O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMuturi, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNyamota, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorMwatondo, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWatene, Graceen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkoko, James M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBett, Bernard K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T11:58:16Zen_US
dc.date.available2024-07-25T11:58:16Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/149259en_US
dc.titleMultiple pathogens co-exposure and associated risk factors among cattle reared in a wildlife-livestock interface area in Kenyaen_US
dcterms.abstractIntroduction: Understanding multi-pathogen infections/exposures in livestock is critical to inform prevention and control measures against infectious diseases. We investigated the co-exposure of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), <i>Brucella</i> spp., <i>Leptospira</i> spp., and <i>Coxiella burnetii</i> in cattle in three zones stratified by land use change and with different wildlife-livestock interactions in Narok county, Kenya. We also assessed potential risk factors associated with the transmission of these pathogens in cattle. Methods: We identified five villages purposively, two each for areas with intensive (zone 1) and moderate wildlife-livestock interactions (zone 2) and one for locations with low wildlife-livestock interactions (zone 3). We sampled 1,170 cattle from 390 herds through a cross-sectional study and tested the serum samples for antibodies against the focal pathogens using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. A questionnaire was administered to gather epidemiological data on the putative risk factors associated with cattle’s exposure to the investigated pathogens. Data were analyzed using the Bayesian hierarchical models with herd number as a random effect to adjust for the within-herd clustering of the various co-exposures among cattle. Results: Overall, 88.0% (95% CI: 85.0–90.5) of the cattle tested positive for at least one of the targeted pathogens, while 41.7% (95% CI: 37.7–45.8) were seropositive to at least two pathogens. FMDV and <i>Brucella</i> spp. had the highest co-exposure at 33.7% (95% CI: 30.9–36.5), followed by FMDV and <i>Leptospira</i> spp. (21.8%, 95% CI: 19.5–24.4), <i>Leptospira</i> spp. and <i>Brucella</i> spp. (8.8%, 95% CI: 7.2–10.6), FMDV and <i>C. burnetii</i> (1.5%, 95% CI: 0.7–2.8), <i>Brucella</i> spp. and <i>C. burnetii</i> (1.0%, 95% CI: 0.3–2.2), and lowest for <i>Leptospira</i> spp. and <i>C. burnetii</i> (0.3%, 95% CI: 0.0–1.2). Cattle with FMDV and <i>Brucella</i> spp., and <i>Brucella</i> spp. and <i>Leptospira</i> spp. co-exposures and those simultaneously exposed to FMDV, <i>Brucella</i> spp. and <i>Leptospira</i> spp. were significantly higher in zone 1 than in zones 2 and 3. However, FMDV and <i>Leptospira</i> spp. co-exposure was higher in zones 1 and 2 than zone 3. Discussion/conclusion: We recommend the establishment of a One Health surveillance system in the study area to reduce the morbidity of the targeted zoonotic pathogens in cattle and the risks of transmission to humans.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceAcademicsen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.available2024-07-25en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationManyenya, S., Nthiwa, D., Lutta, H.O., Muturi, M., Nyamota, R., Mwatondo, A., Watene, G., Akoko, J. and Bett, B. 2024. Multiple pathogens co-exposure and associated risk factors among cattle reared in a wildlife-livestock interface area in Kenya. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 11: 1415423.en_US
dcterms.extent1415423en_US
dcterms.issued2024-07-25en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dcterms.subjectcattleen_US
dcterms.subjectlivestocken_US
dcterms.subjectwildlifeen_US
dcterms.subjectanimal diseasesen_US
dcterms.subjectleptospirosisen_US
dcterms.subjectfoot-and-mouth diseaseen_US
dcterms.subjectbrucellosisen_US
dcterms.subjectq feveren_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: